Snape and Occlumency

[evita2fr]

No: HPFGUIDX 121657



> Alla :
>
> Oh, another quick question, Carol. You just said in your other post 
> that you trust Dumbledore and Hermione as JKR spoke people in their 
> trust of Snape, right?
> 
> So, here we have Hermione speaking up that anybody would feel shaky 
> from attack on their mind. Do you think that she is also correct 
and 
> weakened mental defenses are AT LEAST often sideeffect of the 
> Occlumency? Because if you answer in the positive, I think that at 
> least makes Snape guilty of not warning Harry to take it easy after 
> the lesson.
> 
> Just my opinion,


But how Snape could know about this? Like I try to explain in the 
post #121612 (note the try, it was late), it's a completely new 
situation.

The pains are in his scar, by his link with Voldie, not his brain.

Before him, those who learn Occlumency *couldn't* feeling strange 
pain, because, as far as we know, Harry's scar is the first one to 
exist.

There are also the difference in the attacks.

An *intern* attack of legilimency (like voldie does) is unheard. They 
doesn't know how the Occlumency can help or influence or do anything.

They improvise. And maybe it's why it didn't work on the dreams or in 
the MOM, but worked once on Snape.

Occlumency is the way to stop an extern invasion of the mind.

Harry undergo an *intern* invasion, a different attack, which need a 
different defense, apparently not the Occlumency.

Maybe it's like trying to put off a fire with Nox.

The objectif is similar, but different.

Christelle.