Innocent Albus? (was RE: Why should Harry...)

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 122820


Alla:

Yeah, that is what he says... I can go with Neri's Dumbledore 
looking in the essence of the person and knowing what the person 
is,  but Nope, I disagree that Dumbledore is always watches and 
manages to keep Harry out of harm way.

 
Tonks responds:
As to protecting Harry. Harry isn't dead yet is he?

Alla:

Oh, OK, as long as he is not dead, it is perfectly fine to let him 
be abducted by Voldie thing, see his classmate murdered, him being 
forced to participate in the bizarre ritual of Voldie coming back to 
life AND fighting for his life because I'd say but for Priori 
Incantatem, Harry could very well end up dead at the Graveyard. Of 
course we know looking from the outside that Rowling would not kill 
Harry that early in the story, but looking from "within the story" 
I'd say his death was VERY real possibility.


Tonks:

I am not saying that DD keeps him always from danger. The world is a 
dangerous place, especially the WW. By watching over I mean that DD 
is always there is some form when Harry needs him most, not that he 
watches him 24/7.


Alla:

And I disagree with that.



Just my opinion,

Alla