McG / DD / Re: Why should Harry be expected to listen to anyone at H

lupinlore bob.oliver at cox.net
Wed Jan 26 07:10:34 UTC 2005


No: HPFGUIDX 123070


--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214"
<dumbledore11214 at y...> wrote:
> 
>  
> Gerry:
> I'm sorry but I'm not into political correctness. I meant exactly 
> what I said, and will do so again in the future. Good and nice are 
> not the same thing. Sometimes the good thing is nasty, and the nice 
> thing is bad for you. Those detentions were a very good thing, in 
> themselves. Not something 'horrible but with some good coming out of 
> it.' They were his wake up call. No matter how unpleasant and nasty 
> they were, they made him finally understand how dangerous his 
> situation really was, what the real danger he had been in before had 
> not managed to. Apparently he needed a more hands on experience with 
> injustice and pain to get that message across, and the detentions 
> did that job quite nicely. Since the detentions he actually 
> understands what Umbridge is capable of, and with what she can get 
> away with.
> 
> 
> Alla: 
> 
> Basically you are saying that being tortured with the blood quill 
> was a very good thing for Harry, in itself, correct?
> 
> Please forgive me for asking you to clarify again, but I would like 
> to be sure.
> 


Lupinlore:  Yes, I'm still interested in that one, too.  I'm also
really hoping that is precisely what you DO NOT mean.

> 
> Gerry:
> Well, Maybe because this teacher is actively looking for ways to get
> him expelled. Which means losing his wand and thus most of his magic.
> Which is a really bad thing if he wants to be able continue fighting
> Voldemort.
> 
> 
> Alla:
> 
> 
> Judging by the last pages of OOP, I am NOT sure at all, that Harry 
> wants to continue to fight Voldemort. Do you think he is obligated 
> to save WW?
> 
> 
> 
>  Alla wrote earlier :
> I think that text does not encourage "submission" to Umbridge 
> either. We clearly see at the end  that Fred and George resistance 
> is approved by all teachers and they are greeted as heroes.
> I admire that Harry stood up to Umbridge. He did what good person is 
> supposed to do when faced with evil, IMO.
> 
> 
> Gerry: 
> snip.
> 
> Harry is a minor, and therefore subject to the department of underage
> magic. He cannot quit Hogwarts, without losing his place in the
> magical world. And if the prophecy is correct, deliver the magical
> world to Voldemort in the process.
> 
> 
> Alla:
> 
> Same question. Why does Harry have a duty to save WW? I am not 
> talking about metathinking look at all - because Harry is the hero 
> of the story, etc. I am asking why Harry who does not know that he 
> is the main character in the books has a duty to save WW, who , IMO 
> treats him quite horribly from times to times.

Lupinlore:  I also agree very strongly with this point.  Why on Earth
should Harry be expected to save the WW after they allow him to be
abused in this fashion?


Lupinlore







More information about the HPforGrownups archive