McG / DD / Re: Why should Harry be expected to listen to anyone at H
Amanda Geist
editor at texas.net
Wed Jan 26 19:07:18 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 123113
Lupinlore held forth:
> And yet Gerry REPEATEDLY rejects just that very option. That is,
Alla
> and I have time and again expressed agreement that some good for
Harry
> came out of the detentions, but that the detentions themselves and
in
> themselves remain EVIL. And yet time and again Gerry rejects that
> option to argue that the detentions are GOOD. Now, we would simply
> want to know this, is Gerry saying:
>
> 1) The detentions are GOOD in themselves
> 2) The detentions are EVIL in themselves, but GOOD for Harry comes
> from them
>
> Again and again, Dungrollin, you seem to argue that Gerry means #2,
to
> which Alla and I reply that we have no objection to that. Gerry,
> however, seems to be extraordinarily determined to insist upon #1
and
> to specifically deny the interpretation that you, I, and everyone
else
> seems to be making.
May I suggest to all involved that the resolution of this point won't
make much difference to canon interpretation? This is a philosophical
debate best pursued elsewhere? Because What Gerry Really Meant may be
fascinating, but in and of itself, it doesn't have all that much to
do with Harry Potter.
Thanks,
~Amanda
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive