Dumbledore & Dursleys-What DD Knew

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 123341


Tonks:
 
I think that we all have Harry's best interest in mind. And this can 
explain why some otherwise illegal and immoral ideas have been 
suggested. But let's really think about this. 

Alla:

Personally I think that IF Dumbledore never checked on Harry as 
Susan suggested OR he checked and did nothing as Lupinlore assumed 
Dumbledore did much MORE immoral thing than IF he was able to bribe 
Dursleys. You know, I think that in order to save the child from 
such treatment, bribery will be quite MORAL thing to do, IF we look 
at it in context, but of course that is just my opinion.


Tonks:

Do we really think that a wizard, one of the greatest and most 
powerful wizard of the day, should *threaten* a Muggle with magic.

Alla:

Let me think a second. YES. I really DO think so.
  

Tonks:

Using magic in a Muggle area is against the WW laws.  Bribery is 
against everyone's laws.  Only the weak, the bullies, *threaten* 
others. 

Alla:

If you threaten to save somebody else's life or just make such life 
better, I would not call you bully, more like "good samaritan", but 
again, it is just me.


Tonks:

And yes you can laugh if you will, but DD is a very wise, noble, and 
powerful wizard who knows far more than any of us and because of 
that he will not stoop to the levels that some have suggested.

Alla:

If he did not do anything, but we will learn that he could, TO ME he 
already stoop to those levels.

Tonks:
He kept Harry alive and well. Maybe not as well as some, or even he 
would have like, but well enough. 


Alla:

He kept Harry alive ,whether he was WELL or not, is a VERY debatable 
issue TO ME.


Just my opinion of course,

Alla