Dumbledore & Dursleys-What DD Knew
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 29 02:07:13 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 123345
Pippin:
My question would be, if bribery and threats will really persuade
an unwilling person, why wasn't Harry doing exactly as the
Dursleys wished? Why wasn't Hogwarts completely controlled by
Umbridge?
Alla:
Pippin, who said anything that bribery will definitely persuade
Dursleys? Not me. :o)
I was just agreeing with Lupinlore's suggestion as one of the
POSSIBILITIES. What I was taking a strong exception to is Tonk's
suggestion that bribery IN THIS CONTEXT ( and of course only in
fictional context) will always be immoral and illegal thing to do.
Am I confusing? I am just saying that IF Dumbledore knew FOR SURE
that bribery would work to ease Harry's life, he should have used it
without hesitation.
Just my opinion,
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive