Dumbledore & Dursleys-What DD Knew

dumbledore11214 dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 29 02:07:13 UTC 2005


No: HPFGUIDX 123345


Pippin:
My question would be, if bribery and threats will really persuade 
an unwilling person, why wasn't Harry doing exactly as the 
Dursleys wished? Why wasn't Hogwarts completely controlled by 
Umbridge?


Alla:

Pippin, who said anything that bribery will definitely persuade 
Dursleys? Not me. :o)

I was just agreeing with Lupinlore's suggestion as one of the 
POSSIBILITIES. What I was taking a strong exception to is Tonk's 
suggestion that bribery IN THIS CONTEXT ( and of course only in 
fictional context) will always be immoral and illegal thing to do.

Am I confusing? I am just saying that IF Dumbledore knew FOR SURE  
that bribery would work to ease Harry's life, he should have used it 
without hesitation.


Just my opinion,

Alla








More information about the HPforGrownups archive