The logic of DD's Sacrifice doesn't work
phoenixgod2000
jmrazo at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 19 17:43:05 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 133075
Phoenixgod2000:
This has to be brief. I'm on the road for a job interview but I just
had to chime in a little on Snape.
First of all, let me say that I am not totally convinced one way or
another. If the prediction contest taught us all anything it is that
an authors mind is a deep and guarded place. That having been said,
the mental gymnastics needed to justify Snape are staggering.
throughout the book Dumbledore struck me as someone who thought he
had more time than he did. He was always putting off questions until
a future meeting. He didn't seem to have prepared anyone for his
eventual death, which if he thought it was inevitable he would have
done. When he was at Draco's mercy he spent the time trying to
create a situation in which both of them could survive. He was
offering Draco and his mother his and the Order's personal
protection. He was trying his hardest to convince Draco, not just
for Draco's sake, but his own. He gave every indication of wanting
to live. until the moment Snape walked in the door, DD was trying to
create a win-win situation between he and Draco. Why did Snape have
to stun Flitwick, the only charm master probably powerful enough to
break the death eater only barrier on the tower enterence. there
wasn't anyone around, so he didn't have to keep up DE pretenses in
that moment.
I can only conclude that Dumbledore wanted to live and Snape finally
revealed his true colors.
of course on the other hand, Snape didn't try very hard to hurt
Harry in their rather one sided duel until the very end. Something I
found very odd. Either Snape was under orders not to hurt Harry from
Voldemort or he didn't really want to hurt Harry to begin with.
So when is book seven coming out?
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive