"Some won't like it". The Scar Connection Implications.
phoenixgod2000
jmrazo at hotmail.com
Sat Jun 4 07:02:59 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 130016
> Tonks:
> I think that Harry knew what he was to do and why as Betsy has
> shown. In addition I would like to point out:
>
> First this is a war situation. When your superior tells you to
dig
> a ditch you do it and do it now. You don't ask "why?"
Funny I don't recall him being given an Auror pin or a phoenix
badge. Harry isn't a soldier and he wasn't drafted into any
organization (except maybe by destiny). Dumbledore didn't give him a
junior fledging Order of the Phoenix card. Maybe if he had, you
would have some room to stand on, but as it stands, Harry isn't
under orders to anyone other than his conscience. Harry is under no
duty to obey General Dumbledore unless the order is 'do your
homework.'
>Also Harry
> is not yet an adult and should still do as he is told by an adult
in
> authority over him.
Snape isn't in authority over him when it comes to his 'remedial
potion lessons'. Occulomency is completely outside of his authority
as a school teacher. it is outside of class and Harry is under no
duty to listen to Snape or obey him in any way other than when it
directly pertains to his school duties. Which Occulomency does not
fall under. Harry is there of his own volition. Why do you think
Snape doesn't take any points away (If I am remembering correctly)?
> Just how many people have to tell Harry before he gets it? They
all
> told him, not just Snape and DD. Even Sirius told him. Harry
> wouldn't listen to anyone. Hermione isn't the only *little know it
> all* this time around.
They all told him it was important. Not a single one of them said
why it was important. How could shielding his mind possibly be more
valuable than knowing what Voldemort knows? That is the answer no
one gives.
> Sometimes when one is a spy or in a war situation it is best not
to
> know all the details. This is a game of chess and the pawn
doesn't
> ask the chess master what his plans are, he just makes the moves
he
> has been given.
Harry wasn't asked to make any moves. He was just given short curt
answers that did nothing to assuage his real questions and did
everything to make him ANGRY!Harry.
> And the bottom line is, of course, if Harry had listened and done
> what was expected of him we wouldn't have a story would we?
And if Dumbledore were competent the world wouldn't have to
repeatedly rely on a scarred kid to save the school every year, but
there we are.
>We wouldn't have an example of why we should listen to the
> voice of reason over emotion. Now there is a lesson Snape can
> give.
You're kidding right? You cannot possibly mean that Severus Snape
should serve as an example of emotional control and the triumph of
reason over emotion. the same guy who hates a child he's never met
based on looking like his high school bully father? the same guy who
thinks that humiliating childern is jolly good fun? That guy?
unless you mean as an object lesson, ie 'never turn out like that
guy'
>We
> can't blame the adults.
Sure we can <g> Even your vaunted Dumbledore blames the adults, so
I can.
Harry is not stupid, he knew what he needed
> to do and why.
Once again, no he didn't. He knew the general purpose of Occulomency
but nothing about why Voldemort wanted to take a peek inside his
mind. that was what was needed to be answered.
He didn't want to do it because of his curiosity and
> maybe just a bid of pride. He can see these things and no one
else
> can, that is kinda cool.
I...thats...I don't even know where to begin to respond to that
other than I completely disagree and don't think that is borne out
within canon in even the slightest measure. this is what I believe
Harry was thinking:
If I can get behind that door I will finally know something
important. DD will have to let me in. he won't be able to avoid me
if I know something. maybe I can save someone else like I did Mr
Weasley. Maybe then they'll trust me and let me in. If I can just
show them what I can do they'll have to let me in the order...
Harry wanted to be needed. Like I said in an earlier post, he wanted
to believe that what he was doing and enduring mattered. That it
meant something.
> I know that we all love Harry and he is a kid, and has been
through
> a lot, but we really can't let him off the hook here. It broke my
> heart to see Harry mess up so badly.
Sure Harry bares some responsibility, but imo he only hung himself
with the noose that Dumbledore and the rest of the order
conveniently left hanging around his neck.
But I think the author did
> this to help kids understand that even a really serious mistake
can
> be forgiven and life can go on.
I agree. Harry will eventually forgive Dumbledore for stringing him
along and not treating him like the competent warrior he has
repeatedly demonstrated to be :)
phoenixgod2000
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive