Moral messages (and Hagrid)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Wed May 11 16:13:19 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 128734
Valky:
For the record I think that this particular scene can hardly
undermine the moral message of the books, when it is in context a no
so bright but bighearted (and admittedly burly) oaf of a man standing
for the defense of an oppressed and overwhelmed innocent against his
torturers of a decade of his life.
<SNIP>
Catkind now:
<SNIP>
What I mean is, we may know Dudley was oppressing Harry, but all
Hagrid's seen is a terrified child. Dudley hasn't said a word in the
scene. Hagrid is (rightly) angry with Harry's Aunt and Uncle, and
takes it out on Dudley.
If Hagrid did somehow know what Dudley's like it would be more
excusable, although personally speaking I still find it unpleasant
that he takes out his anger on someone who's not caused it, and that
he is to some extent descending to their level.
Alla:
Well, I speculated once that Hagrid indeed saw what Dudley did to
Harry, because for one reason or another he was substituting for
Arabella on her watch. That is why he IS so angry towards Dudley -
you know, after maybe witnessing "Harry hunting", or something like
that.
It IS only speculation on my part, nothing more and most likely
wrong, but that is what I think. If it is indeed true, than I not
only find Hagrid's reaction to be excusable, but perfectly
understandable, since Dudley and the gang indeed caused Harry a lot
of grief over those ten years.
Catkind:
I don't think I'm just being PC; although from a PC point of view I
think it is still a no-no to be nasty to someone about their weight
even if one does think it is due to being a lazy slob. On the other
hand, if it's about Dudley oppressing Harry, why bring his size into
it?
To be honest, the scene made me dislike Hagrid instinctively when I
first read it. The rest is rationalization.
I'm not saying this particular incident undermines the moral message.
You can take it, as you say, as Hagrid doing something wrong out of
temper and maybe not being "bright". I rather had the impression we
were supposed to be cheering him on.
Alla:
Hmmm, I was telling recently someone off list that I still have not
figured out exactly what political correctness means and when it is
good or bad to be called PC person. If your sincere reaction after
reading that scene was instinctive dislike of Hagrid, I can only
respect it. On the other hand MY sincere reaction after reading that
scene was indeed cheering Hagrid on. Does it mean that I am not being
PC here? I am not sure.
Am I making sense? I am NOT a skinny person at all and Hagrid
reference to Dudley size does not bother me in the slightest, because
I just don't think that Hagrid meant to insult Dudley's weight. I get
a feeling that Hagrid was indeed defending Harry maybe not the best
way, but with the best intentions possible.
Catkind:
Of course I have no argument that it's great that Hagrid is nice to
Harry, and Harry thoroughly deserves it. (I expect most DEs are
equally nice to their friends' children, that doesn't mean I like
them.) And I'm no Dudley apologist, he's unquestionably a nasty
piece of work.
Sorry if anyone found my point nauseating, I hope it's less so with
explanation :-/
Alla:
Right, we agree on it. I just would not go as far as to make a
comparison between Hagrid and DE. I think Hagrid is nice to the vast
majority of the population and only gets angry when someone hurts
his friends.
No, I did not find your post to be nauseating at all. :-)
Just my opinion and my opinion only of course,
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive