Rampant Ingratitude, was Re:Lusting After Snape
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Wed May 25 15:45:26 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 129461
Amiable Dorsai:
Well, I don't know who would be a better authority than the person it
was actually happening to.
And it is an established fact that Snape terminated the lessons.
Pippin:
No harm in that if they weren't *working* --you
can't have it both ways. And as Harry has learned so little about
occlumency, he's hardly an authority.
Amiable Dorsai:
Yep. In this case his action was implying to a student in his charge
that it was OK to break the law for trivial purposes.
Pippin:
I think you've missed my point. Learning the truth about Harry's
midnight rambling and suspected pilfering was not trivial under
the circumstances. There was a Death Eater loose and Harry was
obstructing a criminal investigation, not to mention putting
himself in danger.
Snape couldn't be sure Harry wasn't being used by the baddie
(as indeed he was).
Amiable Dorsai (129415):
At this point, Dumbledore has been dead wrong about three teachers.
Pippin:
And Snape has been dead right -- about Quirrell and Lockhart, and
he was probably right about Lupin too. If it's okay for Harry, whose
brain is channeling Voldemort, to think for himself, why not Snape?
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive