Pondering on the Prank
quick_silver71
quick_silver71 at yahoo.ca
Mon Nov 7 20:28:41 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 142609
In my wandering on HP fandom I've found that "the Prank" (where
Snape was tricked by Sirius Black and almost had a run in with Wolf!
Lupin) is generally analyzed from two points of views : the view
that it was an incredibility reckless prank or the view that it was
attempted murder on the part of Sirius Black. Another common point
made is that it is the culmination of years of conflict/bullying
between the Marauders and Severus Snape. Finally Sirius statement in
PoA (that Snape deserved it) is often used as damning evidence
(which it is) of his own immaturity and his deep and uncontrollable
hatred of Snape.
Now I'd just like to say that the Prank was a horrible event and I
don't condone or support what Sirius did.
That said I've often wondered if the Prank was more complex and
layered then we've been led to believe.
The Prank comes across, to me, as not being part of the ongoing feud
between the Marauders and Snape but as being a singularly unique
event. Sirius Black, by all accounts, acted alone, without even
informing James, against Snape. Yet the conflict with Snape seems to
have been dominated by Snape vs. James...it is James who strikes
first in "Snape's Worst Memory" and most of the dialogue in that
scene involves James and not Sirius. So why did Sirius feel the urge
to either kill or scare Snape badly in 6th year?
Now RAB stands a good chance of being Regulus Black and it could be
that he ties in with the Prank. Wouldn't that be a motive? What if
Sirius Black felt that Snape was luring his younger brother down the
dark path? Sirius would have felt that the time had come for
desperate measures and it ties in nicely with Sirius leaving home at
16 (which occurs in the same general time as the Prank)...it could
be that Sirius feels he's tried everything to save Regulus from his
fate. It also explains his comment in PoA...Regulus ended up dead
and Sirius certainly wouldn't have been forgiving if he felt Snape
was responsible.
It also explains the odd lack of discipline around the
Prank...Dumbledore seems to have a soft spot for kids that try to
murder in the name of family (Draco anyone?) and the fact that
Dumbledore didn't answer Snape in PoA when Snape claims that Sirius
was an attempted murderer at 16 because Dumbledore understand how
much more complex it is (whether Snape ever fully understood is
another question). It should also be noted that if Sirius had really
wanted Snape dead he simply wouldn't have told James
was telling
James Sirius's way out?
Quick_Silver
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive