Harry's emotions his strength or his weakness?
lupinlore
bob.oliver at cox.net
Thu Oct 13 16:19:05 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 141543
>
> Carol responds:
<BIG SNIP>
> I do hope you have a nice, tasty recipe for crow, as I'm equally
> confident that Harry *must* follow Snape's advice--stay away from
Dark
> magic, close your mouth (nonverbal spells), and control your
emotions.
> Yes, a particular emotion (love) is the key to defeating Voldemort,
> but he's not going to find that path by Crucioing people and seeking
> revenge.
Chuckle. Well, if Alla does has such a recipe, perhaps she would be
kind enough to put it in the files section for all of us to copy
down. As for revenge -- well, what is the difference between revenge
and justice? An interesting philosophical quandary, that. But if the
difference is that justice must be impersonal or have no emotional
component -- well, there truly is no such thing as justice in this
world. But there are definitions of justice that see it as being
intimately related to revenge.
Closing his mind or Occlumency? Hmmmm. If that's a necessary
component of Harry's fight against Voldemort, JKR surely has screwed
up. We've had an entire book where she spun her wheels on the
subject, and NOW it's going to come back as a big theme? Chalk up
another mark on the "idiot Dumbledore" chart.
>
<SNIP>
>
> And Snape may not understand Harry at all, but he understands
> Voldemort and the Death Eaters and what is needed to defeat them. He
> is not asking Harry to operate on cold intellect, which would be
> completely out of character. He's asking Harry to control his
> emotions, to conceal his intentions, to avoid the weapons of the
enemy
> (Dark curses)--in short, to do what's necessary to preserve his soul
> intact and stay alive, both necessary conditions for defeating
Voldemort.
>
Well, that's making an awful lot out of a few nasty jibes thrown in
the heat of battle -- especially from a man whose a terrible teacher
in any circumstances. Not to mention it makes Snape out to be both a
lot better person morally and a lot more in control of his own
emotions and reactions than we have evidence of him being.
Snape understands the DEs? He knows how to defeat them? He hasn't
been doing a very good job, so far. Indeed, his understanding and
his habit of suppressing his feelings and instincts seems to have led
him right into a trap -- namely the UV (I personally think, by the
way, that the "Spinner's End" reference is to a spider caught in his
own webs). Not a good model to emulate, that. If Snape had listened
to his instincts (presuming, for the moment he's DDM or OFH), he
could have avoided it quite easily. Instead, he suppressed his
feelings and spun a web of crafty intellect -- and look where it got
him.
Harry by listening to his feelings cost someone his life, but managed
to avoid handing Voldy a major victory. Snape by suppressing his
feelings cost someone his life, and Voldy gained a major victory in
the bargain. Should Harry have been somewhat more in control that
night at the MoM? Of course, although most of the blame for that
catastrophe lies with other parties. Does Snape have much of
anything to teach Harry on this score? Not really, unless Harry
wants to make much worse and more tragic mistakes.
Lupinlore
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive