Bagman as Loyal Death Eater and Big Blond

[gav_fiji]

No: HPFGUIDX 141786

Carol,

I remain far from convinced of your counter argument.

I have, however had useful discussions regarding my article here 
with you and elsewhere and intend some revision.

As stated before time will tell and only Book 7 will have the 
answer. Possibly the most interesting thing to note is that Bagman 
is apparently not in the upcoming fourth movie at all, as I believe 
I have said before.

You are right about Sturgis, but straw colour is quite different 
from blond. Perhaps we shoulkd also look at Goyle as a suspect. 
These points and others will be addressed in my revision.

Further correspondence would be welcome.

> Valky:
> I would argue that the rattling chains support Goddlefrood's
> theoretical DE Bagman, much rather than counter it.

Goddlefrood replies:

Thank you for your input and positive response. Certain matters 
in my article have been challenged and there would be some 
revision, mostly addition actually. The main point Carol relied 
on was that neither Barty Jnr. nor Voldemort mentioned Bagman as 
being involved in the plot in GOF. Veritaserum has been discussed 
at some length.

This point is valid, however if the relevant passages are reread 
closely, as I have done this previous weekend, then it is clear 
that Barty Jnr. only answers direct questions and because his 
interrgators probably have no inkling that Bagman was involved 
there are no questions concerning him. Barty Jnr. does not offer extra information. This is only a negative proof.

I also believe it is probable that if Bagman was involved in the 
plot then only Barty Jnr. would know and there would appear to 
have been no opportunity for Voldemort to become aware of his involvement.

Of course the BBDE may also be Goyle, who was not present at the 
MOM and is described in the graveyard scene as one of the two 
largest Death Eaters. There is no descriptive material on Goyle 
other than his size and Bagman remains my favourite for the role. 
I only wonder why he is not in the fourth movie. But then, like I have stated before, he may only be a periferal (query spelling) character and not that important to the continuing saga.

Next up will be my DADA theory, which I will follow with my Bagman 
revision.



Goddlefrood