Destroying soul bits (was: How good Dumbledore is?/Killing a person or soul)
cubfanbudwoman
susiequsie23 at sbcglobal.net
Thu Oct 20 14:47:48 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 141903
KJ:
> Plus, a question that I posted before, but has not been answered: Why
> is it that no one on the list is at all concerned about killing
> viable soul pieces. Why is it of concern that Harry might split his
> soul killing Voldemort, but there is no concern about the destruction
> of soul parts? <snip> Harry has been specifically sent after
> Voldemort's souls.
SSSusan:
For clarification's sake, are you suggesting that it might be worse to
kill the soul bits than to kill Voldy himself? Or are you wondering
why it is that people seem to be concerned that Harry might end up a
killer (by doing in Voldy in the end), but they don't seem concerned
about his setting off to destroy soul bits?
Assuming it's the latter question, I'll toss this out... and it may
very well seem like a stupid answer, but.... I guess in my mind, when
a person creates a horcrux, he has *already* sacrificed that part of
his own soul. He doesn't CARE! So, yes, I agree with you that it's
apparently something *viable,* but if it's already been sacrificed and
cast off, in a sense, by its owner, should Harry or DD be concerned
about destroying those bits?
Siriusly Snapey Susan
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive