Dumbledore's Death
knorte1
knorte1 at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 20 22:21:21 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 140552
I've just joined this group and still have many e-mails to go before
catching up on all the theories and discussions spawned by HBP but
I'm wondering why everyone seems so completely convinced that DD is
really "dead." First of all, Snape would have had to truly want to
kill DD for the AK to work. I'm not convinced that he did. I'm
sure DD knows a great deal more about Snape than JKR has told us
through her books and I have a hard time believing he could be so
blind as to keep as a trusted ally, someone who would be able to
perform a successful AK on him. Also, after using the AK, all we
are told is that DD's body is raised upwards and then it falls
behind the battlement. We don't see DD again until some time
later. Why couldn't it have been possible for someone else to have
helped DD, unseen by Harry and the DE, and given him a little of
the "living death" potion so that everyone would believe he was
dead. That would allow Harry to proceed on his hero's quest and
allow DD to stay safely hidden in the background gathering more
information and keeping an eye on things. His portrait didn't
speak, it snored. That's certainly ambiguous. Snape didn't allow
anyone to harm Harry, and even continued to instruct him to keep his
mouth shut when casting spells so that they couldn't be deflected.
Finally, Harry saw the Phoenix rise up from the funeral pyre. I see
a strong parrallel here to Gandalf in Lord of the Rings. I think
there's a very good chance that we'll see DD, or an altered version
of him at least, in Book 7. By the way, I agree with anyone who
found this to be the least exciting of JKR's series thus far. I was
quite disappointed but I want to know how the story turns out so, of
course, will be there with the crowds to purchase the last volume.
Knorte1
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive