[HPforGrownups] Re: Killing Dumbledore

[Kemper]

No: HPFGUIDX 157147

> > Kemper earlier: <SERIOUSLY SNIPPED by aussie>
>
> > He made an interesting suggestion based on Snape being good
> > (Rushdie's opinion being correct) and that Dumbledore is dead.
> >
> > Assumtion: Dumbledore is dead because Snape had to kill him.
> >
> > If that's so: Snape now has the potential to make a Horcrux, if he
> > hasn't already.
> >
>
> > Other questions:
> > Does one become evil if he separates his soul?
> >
>
> aussie:
> ...snip...
> 2. Snape may have his own Horcrux? I missed that suggestion. Spooky
> reason for why Severus wouldn't mind making that UV.

Kemper now:
Hmm... My thought on when Snape could create a Horcrux would be after he
killed Dumbledore (assuming he killed him).  And I think if Snape did have a
Horcrux any time prior to UV (or prior to the Tower for that matter),
Dumbledore would have suspected it.  I have no canon support except to say
that the man has some familiarity with the one known to have Horcruxes
(Voldie) and the one some here suspect may have had an Horcrux
(Grindelwald).

Story wise, it would be more dynamic for Snape to create Horcrux from
killing DD thus making Snape even more tragic (assuming, as I always do,
that Snape is Good.)


>
> 3. "Does one become evil if he seperates his soul..." but this is assuming
Snape is good -
> hmmm


Kemper now:
Again, I always assume Snape is good. ;-)

Is the Horcrux wickedest of magical inventions because it requires the
Horcrux creator to kill someone or because it separates the soul?

Can a separated soul pieces be reunited?

Kemper


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]