Killing Dumbledore

[Hagrid]

No: HPFGUIDX 157139

> Kemper: <SERIOUSLY SNIPPED>
> He made an interesting suggestion based on Snape being good 
> (Rushdie's opinion being correct) and that Dumbledore is dead.
> 
> Assumtion: Dumbledore is dead because Snape had to kill him.
> 
> If that's so: Snape now has the potential to make a Horcrux, if he
> hasn't already.
>  
> Other questions:
> Does one become evil if he separates his soul?
> 
> Sorry for any randomness.
> 
> Kemper, accepting that Dumbledore is dead
>
aussie:
Last thing first: 4. Never appologise for Randomness. It makes life 
less predictable/boring and more interesting.

2. Snape may have his own Horcrux? I missed that suggestion. Spooky 
reason for why Severus wouldn't mind making that UV.

1. "Snape HAD to kill (DD) him." Had to for JKR to make Snape into a 
new plot twist - like, alienate him from the rest of the OOTP?
Or maybe HAD to kill DD to save Draco and/or Harry (under the cloak)

3. "Does one become evil..." but this is assuming Snape is good - 
hmmm

aussie (did you like the random order of the answer?)