Horcruxes and murder (was Re: Voldemort killed personally?)

[spookedook]

No: HPFGUIDX 157158

Tinktonks: <SNIP>
>> Is DD's mistake <snip> JKR's way of sneakily telling the reader
that you don't need an AK to create a Horcrux? Even though FB was
AK'd (or so it would appear given the green light although the
words were not destinguishable over the scream) DD does not think
he was and still believes it is possible for a Horcrux to have
been made from this murder. I think DD knows plenty about Horcruxes
and it is one of them 'too noble' things. As he is our authority on
the situation I think it is safe to assume that non AK and non
direct murders are still Horcrux friendly. <<

aussie:
>> Great point, Tonks ... Now look at the idea of directing another
to kill to create a Horcrux, and relate it to Draco.

LV directed Draco to kill DD. Just as DD assumed the snake could be
Horcruxed this way, was that part of the hidden reason Draco was
directed to kill DD and no other? <snip> <<


Tinktonks:
Aussie, thank you. I was hoping someone would jump to this thread
because since writing it I formulated a bit of an expansion and was
DYING (no pun intended-sorry) to link the two.

I'm sure everyone remembers the 'who was polyjuiced thread' which
lead to loads of fantastic theories, well...........

Bellatrix was polyjuiced, it was really LV. We are told Bella is an
accomplished occlumens by Snape/Draco when Harry overhears their
argument so he could go undetected easily.

LV/Bella is the person who performs the UV, without the third that
could never have occurred. This being the case he/she (I'm sorry for
inadvertantly accusing LV of being a ladyboy-please dont AK me in my
sleep) was DIRECTLY responsible for DD's death by performing the UV
therefore DD's death would be Horcux friendly.

I think this is LV's plan for replacing the lost Diary horcrux. I
considered replacing the ring Horcrux but I'm firmly on the side of
Snape is a good guy!!!

Tinktonks