Lupin vs Snape (was Lupin and "Severus")

[wynnleaf]

No: HPFGUIDX 157192


> Renee:
> > I agree with you that Lupin is no hero. But that doesn't mean he's a
> > villain. With all his flaws *and* good points, he's exceedingly human
> > - one of the most human characters in the series. Ironical, seeing
> > that he's a werewolf. But I'm sure the irony is intentional on JKR's
> > part.     
> > 
> 
> Pippin:
> Who says it's not human to be evil? 
> 
wynnleaf
Actually, I think many of the characters seem very "human," just some
are more likeable than others, or better people than others.  

Just looking at things in terms of literary themes, etc., it seems to
me that if JKR is going to have Snape be the "obvious" villian who
turns out to be good, in spite of his nasty demeanor, she's going to
need to balance that with a character who seemed to be "obviously"
good, but turns out to be bad, despite his nice demeanor.  

Lupin is the perfect candidate.  You know, the "smile and smile and be
villian" type.  Shakespeare was, after all, known for hitting the nail
on the head when it comes to understanding "humanity."

In case anyone has not yet looked it up, the essay below that someone
linked to a few days ago, is an excellent look at HBP from the
perspective of what Lupin was doing.  The author thinks Lupin wasn't
really Lupin, but being impersonated by Pettigrew.  However, the same
observations fit a scenario where it *was* Lupin, but Lupin is a traitor.

http://community.livejournal.com/hp_essays/164477.html?thread=3607165#t3607165

wynnleaf