The Last Horcrux Still Unmade
theadimail
theadimail at yahoo.co.in
Sun Jan 15 07:26:39 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 146478
There are certain inconsistencies, it seems to me, in Dumbledore's
theory about seven horcruxes. The greatest is his idea that Voldemort
already has seven horcruxes. He may still be one horcrux short and
still be looking for the Gryffindor object to turn it into a horcrux.
There is no evidence that he has turned Nagini into a horcrux and that
too, after the murder of a foul muggle, if the whole theory of making
horcruxes is to make them after a particularly important murder.
Further, if Voldemort's quest for seven-part soul and seven horcruxes
is anyway significant, then there seems to be no grand effect of
making seven horcruxes. If Voldemorte had turned Nagingi into a
horcrux after Frank's murder, there should have been some signifact
fallout to his state. But there is none. He is still in that child-
like state till Harry is kidnapped later in the novel. So what gives?
The reasons adduced by Dumbledore on why he thinks Nagini is a
horcrux are no reasona at all because Nagini is devoted and faithful
and seems to share an unusual relationship with him even before the
Frank Bryce murder. ANd in Gobelt of Fire we see that Voldemort does
not want to settle down for a cheap alternative and prefers to wait
for harry's blood eventhough it is hard to get. So why would he settle
down for Nagini when his original quest is to get the objects of the
four original founders.
This leads to another aspect of Half-Blodd Prince that I was
intrigued about. The author said that she was chipping in large clues
in the book on which the next book can be constructed; is
Dumbledore's theory supposed to be one of those clues? Is the
intellectual map for Harry all set out and all he has to do is find
out the remaining horcruxes or is there going to be some bafflement
for Harry and ourselves along the way?
Regards,
Adi
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive