Evil Hermione

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 154916

> Alla:
> I already mentioned that I totally see the parallel, but I want  
to 
> add - Peter was at MOST two or three years older than Marietta 
IMO,  
> so adult/child does not really work for me here.
> 
> 
> 
> Julie:
> No he wasn't. Marietta is most likely 16 like Cho, perhaps just 
turned  17,
> though there's no reason to assume that. James and Lily were 22 
when
> they died, so that was also Peter's age. Thus he was 5 or 6 years 
older 
> than Marietta.
<SNIP>


Alla:

I meant when Peter **started** pasing information to Voldemort. 
Sirius accuses him of doing it for a year before Potters died. That 
is what Sirius **knows**, who is to say that he did not start 
earlier?

And I think it is a possibility that Marietta is seventeen - we know 
that Hermione turns seventeen early, why not Marietta, so at the 
most IMO we have four year difference, not five-six years difference 
and I think it could have been less.


  
> Julie:
> What horrible consequences? As Hermione said, they might  have
> been expelled. I don't see that as "horrible."
>
Alla:

See Hagrid's situation for horrible consequences of being expelled 
in WW, that is only if the kids would not have ended up in front of 
Wizengamot and In Azkaban, then expulsion would have been the least 
of their worries, but expulsion alone would have been enough to ruin 
**all** their futures thanks to dear Marietta.

Oh, and I meant to reply yesterday and lost who said it. I will do 
it here, sorry Julie. :)
Was it Pippin?

Why shouldn't we trust Umbridge words that Marietta did come to 
her on her own? Because **we** think that Marietta is not that bad?

Well, dear Dolores said she did come voluntarily, I am going to 
believe her. :)

Otherwise some other statements of hers also need to be taken with 
big gran of salt, no?

JMO