Traitors, friends, loyalty and betrayal (was Evil Hermione) long
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Mon Jul 10 17:26:52 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 155160
> Nikkalmati:
> Lanval touched on the central question regarding Marietta and Hermione. Two
> virtues appear to be paramount in Potterverse: courage and loyalty. The
> Marietta incident is just one example of betrayal found throughout the books and
> I think it has to be seen in conjunction with all the other incidents.
> The books begin with a huge act of betrayal by Pettigrew for the base motive
> of saving his own skin, thus, an act against both courage and loyalty.
> Sirius is the opposite character in this scenario, displaying both courage and
> loyalty ( he advised Pettigrew he would have died rather than betray the
> Potters and he broke out of Azkaban when he realized Harry was in danger, for
> example).
Pippin:
Loyalty is important, yes, but loyalty to what? To a person or a group? Or
to a set of values? I think it's the values, people. JKR makes that clear
when Neville is rewarded for turning against the Trio.
It is difficult for me to judge Marietta's actions, because I don't know what
values she was choosing when she went to Umbridge. Was she choosing to
enrich herself as Alla seems to think, or was she choosing between her
mother and an unstable, erratic boy who leaves her best friend in tears half
the time?
But I know what Hermione's values are supposed to be, and that bothers
me, because the parchment hex does not exemplify choice. First and
foremost, it doesn't allow for the choice of mercy.
Regardless of whether mercy would have been appropriate in this
case, the parchment leaves no option for it. Some have said that
Hermione would show mercy if she was asked to, but Hermione's
friends have received mercy unasked. The Flying Car incident
was in its way a betrayal of the whole WW, but Hermione would
be very lonely at school if Harry and Ron had been expelled.
Secondly, although everyone else's future was just as much at stake as
Hermione's, she didn't give any one else a choice about how that future
was going to be protected. That's elitist, IMO. I know Hermione doesn't want
to be elitist, so I think this was a case where she, as was often the
case with Sirius, didn't live up to her personal philosophy. She took
it for granted that her choices would reflect what she believes in,
but her judgement was whipsawed by her "faults and fears."
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive