[HPforGrownups] Question to Neri and other supporters of Harry as horcrux
Kathryn Jones
kjones at telus.net
Sat Jul 15 18:14:21 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 155433
dumbledore11214 wrote:
> That is Rebecca's reference to Dumbledore's remark that Harry's soul
> is "untarnished and whole".
>
> So, to anybody who thinks that Harry is a Horcrux, what is your
> interpretation of Dumbledore's remark, especially since JKR said
> that Dumbledore's guesses are never far off mark ( paraphrase), I
> think specifically in relation to horcruxes?
>
> Do you think Dumbledore is lying here? Do you think he does not know?
>
> Do you think that Harry's soul somehow could be "untarnished and
> whole" with the piece of Voldy sould attached to it? ( I confess I
> find this interpretation to be highly unlikely)
>
> Thank you very much,
KJ writes:
I think that Harry having a whole, untarnished soul is very
important to his protection against the soul piece. As DD's little
silver instrument describes it, Harry's soul and the Voldy soul piece
are divided. I think that DD was checking for that very problem after
Harry had been able to see through the snakes eyes. I also think that
this division or separation has to be taken care of, which is why Snape
said "No Unforgiveables for you, Potter". As long as Harry remains whole
and untarnished, Voldemorte will not be able to make use of that soul
piece when they finally confront each other.
I think that Dumbledore has known about it, or guessed since the
night at Godric's Hollow, and that this knowledge was the basis for his
"great plan". JMHO, of course.
KJ
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive