Question to Neri and other supporters of Harry as horcrux

[Neri]

No: HPFGUIDX 155473

> Alla: 
> What I have not seen anybody addressing though yet and if I missed 
> it, please refer me to the relevant post? :)
> 
> That is Rebecca's reference to Dumbledore's remark that Harry's soul 
> is "untarnished and whole".
> 
> So, to anybody who thinks that Harry is a Horcrux, what is your 
> interpretation of Dumbledore's remark, especially since JKR said 
> that Dumbledore's guesses are never far off mark ( paraphrase), I 
> think specifically in relation to horcruxes?
> 
> Do you think Dumbledore is lying here? Do you think he does not know?
> 
> Do you think that Harry's soul somehow could be "untarnished and 
> whole" with the piece of Voldy sould attached to it? ( I confess I 
> find this interpretation to be highly unlikely)


Neri:
I thought that Rebbeca's original post was actually for the
Horcrux!Harry theory, although she didn't use that term.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/153541

Going by Dumbledore's logic, it's Harry's *choices* that show the true
condition of his soul, not the soul's composition or origin. In fact,
in that very paragraph were Dumbledore talks about the Harry's
"untarnished and whole" soul he says it was in spite of"
"temptations", "suffering" and "lure of power like Voldemort's". How
exactly was Harry lured by powers like Voldemort's?

JKR first used the prophecy as a cheap plot device, but one book later
she made it thematic, and the theme was the theme of choices. I expect
her to do a similar thing with the Horcruxes plot device, and the
theme will be the same. 

 
Neri, embarrassed by the compliments.