Harry & Slytherin (was:Re: Sorting Hat (was: muggle baiting vs. muggle torture)
cubfanbudwoman
susiequsie23 at sbcglobal.net
Tue Jul 18 02:11:33 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 155546
Triin:
> > What is it about Harry's personality that makes him so
> > Slytherin that the hat had to be begged not to put him there? He
> > is such a *straightfoward* person, with a "saving people thing",
> > etc; to me he sounds like an epitome of Gryffindor values..
Betsy Hp:
> Huh. I would never have thought to describe Harry
> as "straightforward". He strikes me as someone who plays his
> cards very close to the vest, letting as few people in as
> possible. <snip>
SSSusan:
I can't speak for Triin, of course, but I wonder if what was meant
by calling him a *straightforward* person is simply that he's not...
I don't know... duplicitous? He's not going to *consciously* tweak
how he comes across to others. He's not going to present one face
to one person and another face to another, simply because he senses
some benefit or advantage in doing so. He's "just Harry," in other
words. He is who he is, and that's that.
But, yes, he *does* play his cards close to the vest. And he is
naturally an introvert. I think those don't *not* fit with being
straightforward. Maybe you're thinking of straightforward in the
sense of someone who's *forthright*? But Triin may mean it more
like this (from dictionary.com):
1. Not circuitous or evasive; honest and frank.
2. Free from ambiguity or pretense; plain and open.
Betsy Hp:
> Because of that I think Harry rather naturally goes a bit sneaky
> when he wants to find something out. I don't think it's an
> accident that his two most important tools are a cloak that allows
> him to disappear and map that allows him to silently spy. Harry
> likes to creep about rather than straightforwardly ask for
> information.
SSSusan:
This is a *great* insight into Harry's personality, imo. So, okay,
he is sneaky... but I still think he can be straightforward in that
the sneakiness isn't really about pretense; it's about facility or
necessity (as Harry sees it). What I'm saying is that I think your
comment here shows that your use of the word "straightforwardly"
might well be more in line with "forthrightly" than with the "free
from pretense, honest and frank" kind of definition.
Sherry:
> > I think Harry was meant to be in Gryffindor, and that
> > unlike what so many seem to see in that scene, it was never
> > the Hat's second choice for Harry.
Betsy Hp:
> I don't know that Slytherin was the Hat's *first* choice for Harry
> (Gryffindor may well have been). But the Hat does seem to imply
> that it's a *viable* choice, a House Harry could do well in.
SSSusan:
I have always maintained that the hat never "wanted" to put Harry in
Slytherin. All it really does it tell Harry that he would do well
there. Yet Harry insists that he doesn't want Slytherin, and the
hat goes along with this. In my view, the hat simply wanted Harry
to MAKE HIS OWN CHOICE. It pointed out some benefits of other
houses besides Gryffindor, but it never said, "Oh, not Gryffindor,
Harry! I really want you to be in Slytherin!!"
I think the hat simply "wanted" to highlight to Harry -- hoping that
he would look back on it, eventually -- that it was truly about
CHOICES.
Siriusly Snapey Susan
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive