[HPforGrownups] Re: muggle baiting vs. muggle torture
Magpie
belviso at attglobal.net
Thu Jul 20 02:56:00 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 155678
festico:
> Hm, I don't think it has anything to do with the level of harm. I
> would expect Muggle-baiting is using magic maliciously on Muggles
> because they are Muggles. From the examples we get from canon
> (shrinking keys, Willy Widdershin's toilets) quote often not even
> specific Muggles but any Muggle will do.
Magpie:
But how can they legislate based on motivation? Willy Widdershins could
have said he didn't prank the Muggle because he was a Muggle, but because he
was annoyed by him, or disliked his hair. It seems like Muggle-baiting must
be wrong by Wizard standards either because they actually think it's wrong
to Prank Muggles (like the way they presumably disagree with the Black who
likes to hunt Muggles) or because it causes danger to Wizards.
steven:
IMO this further undercuts the
argument some have made here that the Twins are just opportunists who gave
Harry the Marauders Map and the "free stuff" from their shop only because he
is rich and famous and because they were calculating that they would
eventually get something back from him
in return.
Magpie:
I don't think that was the argument. It's not that the Twins either love
Harry to death as a little brother or they're just using him. It's that the
Twins can genuinely like Harry a lot while being opportunists.
Steven1965aaa:
Lets' look at the evidence: How many examples do we have in the books of
the Twins pranking Muggles who are NOT gits?
Magpie:
No one has ever challenged the fact that the Twins don't Prank Muggles all
the time, or that they don't like the way Dudley treated Harry (they also
wanted to try out their candy). The point is that for many it's not an
issue of what motivations were in their heart, what matters is that this was
an abuse of their greater power. No one would deny that Snape picks on
Harry because he dislikes him personally and disliked his father personally.
That doesn't make not a teacher abusing his power. A Muggle parent in
Arthur's position would perhaps be telling their child that no, it's not
okay to steal a kid's wheelchair to laugh at him crawling around as long as
you weren't doing it just because you hated people who couldn't walk.
a_svirn:
They always prefer weaker targets for
their "jokes": it is OK to bait Ron or Percy, but they didn't care to cross
Charley, did they?
Magpie:
Yes, the Twins are pretty open about their pragmatism. It's usually played
for a joke that they know who not to cross-far more often than we see them
holding back because someone else is weaker.
-m
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive