[HPforGrownups] A Trelawney Thought
MadameSSnape at aol.com
MadameSSnape at aol.com
Sun Jun 11 23:51:10 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 153693
In a message dated 6/11/2006 7:37:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
inspirit at ptd.net writes:
So in my exhaustive search for one tiny little spark of hope that Dumbledore
may yet live... I submit that as he was not the first to rise from the table
that fateful Christmas dinner, he will not be the first of the group to die.
Um... that means either Ron or Harry will be. Do we really want to sacrifice
either of them for Dumbledore? I think I need a headache draught.
------------------------
Sherrie here:
I'd spotted this too, when I first read the book. My thought is that, as
Ron & Harry rose simultaneously - we're going to lose them both.
I've assumed Ron's death as a given, actually, since the chess game in
PS/SS, and Harry's since the beginning of the series. This little vignette
indicates that their sacrifices will happen together - if not at the same moment,
at least within the same brief time frame. Perhaps Ron, as in the chess game,
will be the sacrifice that distracts the opposition just long enough for
Harry to "check" Voldemort?
Sherrie
"What's got YOUR wand in a knot?"
- Hermione Granger, HARRY POTTER & THE GOBLET OF FIRE
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive