Minerva and Tom: 6 theories ~ ESE!McGonagall
Tonks
tonks_op at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 15 03:29:44 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 153876
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "annemehr" <annemehr at ...>
wrote:
>
> > I have also wondered a lot about McGonagall lately, and,
> > unfortunately, I keep comming back to the McGonagal ESE theory I
> saw summarized here some time ago. (Snip> Annemehr:
> I don't know if this is the one you were thinking of, but there's
a
> lovely old TBAY of Elkins's here:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/39470
>
> It's from 2002, but there are replies from '03 and '05 as well.
Tonks:
Well Elkins does make a good case. The thought of McG being on the
opposite side had occurred to me briefly once, as I try to look at
everything from every angle. But still I don't know. I just can't
imagine that DD could be that wrong about anyone. She would have to
be a better occumens than Snape to live that long in the company of
DD and not have him see through her. I do wonder about all those
green robes. On the other hand, can't a woman wear any color she
wants? Is green, or blue banned forever just because of your
house? Always red, gold or basic black can get a bit boring.
It would be an interesting twist if McG was ESE. But it all comes
back to DD's judgment and do you trust it. I do, so my vote is McG
is just what she appears to be.
Oh the other hand... Elkins does make a very convincing point and
it makes you wonder, just a little.
Tonks_op
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive