Minerva and Tom: 6 theories ~ ESE!McGonagall

Tonks tonks_op at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 15 03:29:44 UTC 2006


No: HPFGUIDX 153876

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "annemehr" <annemehr at ...> 
wrote:
>
> > I have also wondered a lot about McGonagall lately, and, 
> > unfortunately, I keep comming back to the McGonagal ESE theory I 
> saw summarized here some time ago. (Snip> Annemehr:
> I don't know if this is the one you were thinking of, but there's 
a 
> lovely old TBAY of Elkins's here:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/39470
> 
> It's from 2002, but there are replies from '03 and '05 as well.


Tonks:
Well Elkins does make a good case.  The thought of McG being on the 
opposite side had occurred to me briefly once, as I try to look at 
everything from every angle.  But still I don't know. I just can't 
imagine that DD could be that wrong about anyone. She would have to 
be a better occumens than Snape to live that long in the company of 
DD and not have him see through her.  I do wonder about all those 
green robes. On the other hand, can't a woman wear any color she 
wants?  Is green, or blue banned forever just because of your 
house?  Always red, gold or basic black can get a bit boring. 

It would be an interesting twist if McG was ESE.  But it all comes 
back to DD's judgment and do you trust it.  I do, so my vote is McG 
is just what she appears to be.

Oh the other hand...  Elkins does make a very convincing point and 
it makes you wonder, just a little.
 
Tonks_op









More information about the HPforGrownups archive