Maligning Lupin
spotsgal
Nanagose at aol.com
Thu Mar 23 17:10:48 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 149940
>> Christina:
>> Of course, ESE!Lupin would never have had a problem if he just
>> hadn't told Sirius about the prophecy in the first place, so I'm
>> a bit confused as to why he would have done so.
> Pippin:
> As for why Lupin told him, their whole relationship was based on
> shared secrets.
Christina:
Their childhood relationship, perhaps, but their adult
relationship? No way. Lupin absolutely holds all the cards - there
is no reason for him to tell Sirius a secret to keep his
friendship. Lupin is the first person to believe Sirius's story, he
stays with Sirius in 12GP, he tries to resolve conflicts between
Sirius and other members of the Order. Sirius probably still has
some residual guilt over his questioning Lupin's loyalty. There's
also the power of nostalgia, and the shared pain between the two
men. There is no need for Lupin to make extra overtures of
friendship. Lupin telling Sirius a "secret" to keep their
friendship going also doesn't make sense if you consider the fact
that Sirius obviously did not *know* it was a secret if he blurted
it out in a crowded room. Defeats the purpose, really.
>> Christina:
>> It isn't a matter of being for or against werewolf liberation.
>> Each side of the war has a different view of what "werewolf
>> liberation" means. For LV, it's giving the werewolves fresh meat
>> and the ability to get revenge on wizardfolk. For Dumbledore,
>> it's providing the werewolves with education and jobs. I think
>> Lupin can tell the difference.
> Pippin:
> In any case, Dumbledore hasn't been able to do much to provide the
> werewolves with education and jobs.
Christina:
And Voldemort has done more?
> Pippin:
> Cheerful and resigned to his lot is the Uncle Tom stereotype.
> It's hollow and demeaning and I'll be surprised if JKR doesn't
> point that out in the end.
Christina:
A stereotype that JKR has ample opportunity to explore with the
house elves, which parallels American slavery much better than
lycanthropy. I also should have been clearer. I think that Lupin
cares about werewolf discrimination, and I think he wants it to
end. Which is why he is allied with Dumbledore in the first place -
so that other people may take advantage of the benefits he had.
What I meant was that Lupin doesn't have much passion. He doesn't
have anger. He doesn't make Sirius-type emotional declarations.
Fenrir Greyback and his followers are *angry* about their lot in
life and want *revenge*. They don't care about equality; they want
to "create enough werewolves to overcome the wizards (HBP, Ch 16)."
Lupin has a cooler head than that; that's why I think it's unlikely
that he would fall prey to Voldemort's empty promises. Fenrir uses
anger as his rallying cry, hoping to stir up a swirl of emotion. I
just can't see that working on Lupin.
Your theory also requires that Voldemort be making nice with the
werewolves in the first war. Is there evidence that this was even
the case? I've dug around a bit and haven't found anything.
> Pippin:
> ::shrug:: To paraphrase Arthur, when you're dealing with a witch
> like Umbridge, sometimes you have to join forces with people you'd
> rather avoid.
Christina:
I understand the concept of the lesser of two evils. But I still
fail to see how *Voldemort* ends up being the lesser of two evils.
Dumbledore does not equal the Ministry; they have a history of
friction. The Ministry is often hiding in the corner, covering
their ears (or throwing their hands up in resignation), while
Dumbledore is taking active steps to thwart Voldemort. There are
not two choices here - there are three.
> Pippin:
> Lupin was naive enough not to believe what he'd heard about Fenrir.
> Maybe he was naive enough not to believe what he'd heard about
> Voldemort too.
Christina:
When was Lupin "naive enough not to believe what he'd heard about
Fenrir"? Lupin says that he felt pity for the werewolf who bit him
as a child, but that was before he got information about Fenrir
Greyback. There's no reason to believe that Lupin disbelieved
anything he had heard about Greyback.
>> Christina:
>> The bottom line for me, theoretically, is that ESE!Lupin
>> completely fails the litmus test I give to all theories - What
>> questions does this theory answer?
I'm snipping the questions you posed that have plausable answers
given or very strongly hinted at in the canon. I'm also snipping
questions that have been discussed to death, ones that have common-
sense answers, and ones that may implicate *an* ESE plot but which
have no specific relevance to Lupin.
> Pippin:
> Why didn't James want Dumbledore to be his secret keeper?
Christina:
Because he, along with three others, fooled Dumbledore for years as
teenaged boys.
> Pippin:
> Why couldn't JKR tell us why the diary plot would have made
> present day Voldemort stronger?
Christina:
Horcruxes? And how does this relate to Lupin?
> Pippin:
> Why is there an anvil-sized hint that Lupin is an occlumens?
Christina:
Occlumency/Legilimency tends to reflect personality. Lupin is a bit
closed, and so it only logically follows that he would be talented
at Occlumency. Maybe his "furry little problem" pushed him to learn
it. In any case, a talent for Occlumency does not equal guilt.
> Pippin:
> Why does the moon appear and disappear *before* Lupin transforms?
> Why did JKR give an evasive answer when asked whether Lupin
> transformed inside the shack? She's usually willing to admit it
> when she just flubbed up.
Christina:
You seem to really like this bit as evidence for ESE!Lupin. Why?
Being evil doesn't give Lupin control over when he transforms. No
werewolf has that.
> Pippin:
> How are Order members once again being picked off one by one?
Christina:
Spies aren't needed for Order members to die.
> Pippin:
> The authors of the Talmud say that the true test of remorse is
> when you face the same temptation and don't repeat your sin. That
> sounds like a good test to me. So far, Lupin has failed.
Christina:
In your opinion. I think Lupin has shown ample remorse. Lupin
doesn't exist in a bubble; take out your measuring stick and look at
the other characters. And again, a lack of remorse does not an evil
person make. If we are using meaningful remorse as an indicator of
evil, than our number of villainous characters has just about
tripled. As you said yourself, werewolves are not divided into good
people and Voldemort supporters. There are those in between, like
Lupin, who has made poor decisions in the past but who remain
dedicated to Dumbledore.
Christina
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive