Dumbledore MAY be alive.... and his name may be Godric Gryffindor
Adriana
glykonix at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 25 09:53:43 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 150022
Who really is Albus dumbledore.
Albus Dumbledore is the Headmaster of Hogwarts school of witchcraft
and magic, considered by most as the most powerful wizard of modern
time blah blah blah and all that jazz. But is he really that "modern"?
This whole theory of mine came while I was trying to figure out why
Harry had been placed into Gryffindor.
Yes we all know it's because he chose so, or so Headmaster Dumbledore
tells us.
But again the hat is supposed to place them in the house that most
suits them. And after book 6 I am quite sure that he would have "done
well in Slytherin".
So why did Harry go to Gryffindor? Because he choose so.
Why did Harry choose Gryffindor? Because that's what Albus Dumbledore
wanted.
How could Dumbledore have made Harry go to Gryffindor when he had not
even spoken to the kid you'll say. By sending Hagrid that's how. He
could have sent a number of people far more prepared to dealing with
hysterical muggles.
Minerva McGonagall would be a very good choice. She's a lot more
presentable in the muggle world, she does care about the boys well
being otherwise she wouldn't have sat there in the damp English
weather on the doorsteps of the Dursley family just to see that the
boy was safe with them.
And well if she was too busy, even Snape would have feared quite well
I believe, especially now that we have found out he is half muggle and
has lived half his life in a muggle environment. (He lives in a muggle
neighborhood, the hose is a little adapted by magic but it is still
muggelish.)
So he would have known how to behave around muggles.
And there are a plethora of witches and wizards that could have served
to "fetch" potter.
But he chose a half giant, half oaf, wizard who isn't even aloud to do
magic and who looks considerably ill placed in the muggle world.
Why did he choose him? Because if there was anybody in the world who
could get Harry to want to be in Gryffindor, then that was Hagrid.
(Hagrid clearly badmouthed slitherin, making them sound far worse then
they are.)
And let's not dwell in this as it is not my intention to prove that
Dumbledore is a manipulative old coot or that Hagrid is a biased half
breed. (They are both very lovable characters and I greatly enjoy both
of them.)
But let us get back to my main idea, Harry is a Gryffindor and
extremely loyal to Dumbledore. So loyal that in fact he managed to
call Fawkes at his side in times of need by just thinking of
Dumbledore. And here is how the whole idea bloomed into my brain,
Harry by thinking of Dumbledore called Fawkes at his side along with
the hat and Godric Gryffindors sword. By thinking of Dumbledore Harry
managed to summon two objects that had once belonged to Gryffindor,
and now belong to Dumbledore. And here is where I go one step further
and say that all three: Fawkes, the sorting hat and the sword once
belonged to Gryffindor
and still do
As Dumbledore is in fact
Gryffindor.
Dumbledore does seem to have some kind of a friendship with the damned
hat and we know from the hats song (forth book) that it was once owned
by Gryffindor. And why does Dumbledore have the sword of Gryffindor?
Yes you'll say it's not actually Dumbledores but that it was just
lying around in his office squeezed in the hat. (And I wonder what
other surprises the hat may bring).
Yes I know that by now you deem me worthy of a place in St Mungo, but
hear me out. It all starts with the first book when Dumbledore hid the
philosophers stone in Erised's mirror. Now even though at the time he
seemed omniscient there was no way he could have predicted exactly how
things would occurred.(if he wasn't so manipulative as to orchestrate
it all) And I don't know who else but Harry in the state in which he
was, could have taken the stone back from the mirror. It's hard to
believe that there is somebody, who not for one moment would think of
using the stone for himself, a stone that grants immortality and
immeasurable wealth
With the possible exception of somebody who IS
immortal already. And this brings me back to good old Dumbledore. He
is immortal thus he could get the stone out if he wanted since he did
not need it for himself.
Not yet convinced
not even by half you tell me.
I do find the friendship between Nicholas Flamel and Dumbledore a bit
odd. There is a 500 hundred year gap between then, but then again
there is no one as old as Flamel so it should not be so surprising.
Passing on to how could Dumbledore be immortal when we have just seen
him die. Yes it's true we saw him being hit by the killing curse, but
then again we also saw in book five, how Fawkes swallowed the killing
Curse aimed at Dumbledore and in a way he did die but then as he is a
Phoenix was born again from his ashes. And that people is what I
believe Dumbledore did. He was hit by the killing curse he died and
then at his burial he was on fire, a fire in which Harry was able to
see a white Phoenix. And that is what I think Dumbledore is
a human
Phoenix.
And this also explains why Dumbledore was looking so bad in his last
year. I belive he was way past his burning day, but he was still
holding on to "this life". I suppose that after each burning he would
assume a different identity but he needed this one to sort things out.
In order to prepare Harry and try and make some order in the mess that
the ministry keeps making of things. His death after all does seem to
have brought together all sorts of magical people even for a short
time. (and this also doesn't make Snape a bloody traitor, as I refuse
to see him, I even think Dumbledore had told Snape something of this.
and that's what the whole pleading business is: Please Severus "trust
me I'll be OK.")
Now on paper it doesn't seem to make that much sense to me either. But
here are some other details that seemed to corroborate my theory.
Dumbledore does resemble Godric Gryffindor as he is depicted in the
collectors' cards from the three games. Both he and Gryffindor had
auburn hair, blue eyes a crooked nose. Dumbledore does seem to posses
a lot of power hidden under his friendly, slightly senile, old mans
appearance. We see it manifest on several occasions: hear his
thundering, booming voice; see him fight with a grace and power that
defies his age. And from what Harry says at times Dumbledore seems to
glow (just like the ghosts) and just like Fawkes in battle. And he is
a lot wiser then many witches or wizards close to his age, I mean he
is more cunning then Slughorne who is a Slytherin.
Now I do realize I have made up a theory worthy of Dan Brown here. But
I hold strong to it as it does seem to explain a lot, and makes a loot
of sense, to me at least.
And to the few friends with which I have discussed it.
One of them says that it makes perfect sense and that she buys it, but
that she is sure that J.K. Rowling never thought of it.
If you have anything to say on this pro or contra (especially contra,
I want to see if there are things I have not thought about) please
write to me (soon).
Glykonix
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive