Amortentia and re The morality of love potions/Merope and Tom Sr.
sistermagpie
belviso at attglobal.net
Tue May 16 16:53:48 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 152303
> Alla:
>
> Could you give me an example of Merope being a victim in her
> relationship with Tom Riddle? I mean, I don't think anybody would
> argue that she was the victim of horrible abuse, but how is it in
> any way, shape or form diminishes the wrongness of what she did to
> that poor man?
>
> He did not ASK for his life to be destroyed, as you said he never
> remarried. I speculate that he was so traumatised that he was
unable
> to rebuild his life ever again, basically the woman he loved was
> taken away from him, IMO.
>
> And I am also not talking about Tom Riddle general character, for
> all we know as somebody told me he could have been a real jerk in
> his relationship with the world in general. But it is irrelevant
IMO.
>
> He did not do anything to Merope, he had a misfortune to be seen by
> her.
Magpie:
Yeah, I have to say I find some of the arguments here disturbing
because they seem like just an inversion of the usual "blame the
victim" arguments that are so common in real rape cases, only
instead of the victim being considered automatically guilty because
she's a woman and so sexually asking for it, it seems Tom is
automatically guilty because he's a man, and handsome and rich, so
can't be the victim. Yet this is exactly what JKR is turning on its
head by making Tom the Muggle and Merope the witch. I don't think
we're just told Tom never remarried, we're told he rarely left the
house after his experience.
Lots of rapists were abused growing up, and while this may explain
their motivations it does not make a crime any less of a crime, just
as Tom's relatively good life doesn't mean a crime committed against
him is less of a crime. As far as I can see Merope was in control of
her actions every step of the way. It takes two people to make a
baby, but of these two people Merope was the one far more in control
since Tom was the one with his reason impaired by Love Potions. (As
a witch Merope would also have access to birth control as well.) The
thing Tom is guilty of taking responsibility for the child created
by him. He also leaves his wife when the magic binding her to him
wears off.
I'd say one of the things clear about Tom Jr.'s life is that he
really never knew love, even in conception. It wasn't just his
father who did wrong by him and didn't care about him, assuming he
knew Tom existed, which he may not have. (We don't hear that he
ever tried to find out what happened to Merope, since as far as we
know he had trouble even leaving the house after his experience.)
If his father either didn't know about him and didn't want to know
about him, or saw him as just a symbol of his own abuse, his mother
quite possibly couldn't see him at all, because she had trouble
seeing anything but what she wanted for herself. We assume she made
a good sacrifice in setting Tom free of his love potion, but she may
have still been going after her own ends. Iow, she may have begun
to resent knowing that Tom only loved her because he was drugged and
longed for the "real love" that was freely given.
Another thing to remember about the Muggle/Wizard worlds is the
different position Witches seemed to have always enjoyed in the WW.
Merope herself was cowed at home, but she's not subject to the
disapproval or laws of Muggle society of the time. She's not
whatever 19th century heroine sounds most sympathetic. She's not a
penniless, outcast Muggle girl, she's a Witch. A witch with a lot
of disadvantages and psychological problems that make her incapable
of going on with life, but not a girl destroyed by sexist Muggle
society and seduced by the rich aristocrat. This story is really
kind of daring in the way it challenges assumptions and stereotypes
(or perhaps some might find it problematic for exactly that reason).
Can we fall back on familiar injustices when the power in the
situation is flip-flopped?
-m
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive