Harry is Not A Horcrux, But the Sword Is

[bridgetteakabiit]

No: HPFGUIDX 161330

> >>KathyO:
>> I agree Harry isn't a Horcrux, however I believe that his scar
either is or contains a Horcrux.
>> <snip>
>> It is the one thing that does make sense throughout the books, starting with Dumbledore saying scars can come in handy, and remembering that the last word in the last book is 'scar'. <<

bridgetteakabiit:
I am confused. If the scar is, or contains a horcrux, how can it be
destroyed without Harry being destroyed? That doesn't sound like it
would "come in handy" in that sense. If Voldemort can't be destroyed
until all the horcruxes are destroyed, and Harry's scar is the other
horcrux, then it sounds like Harry has to be destroyed in order for
Voldemort to be.

Plus, his scar already has come in handy...helping save Mr. Weasely, and the scar is proof that Voldemort transfered powers, such as parselmouth...which has obviously come in handy many times, since he can always understand what Voldemort is saying, plus could open the Chamber of Secrets and such.

I do think that the missing horcruxes are most likely items that have
always been around and spoken about in the books, since that is the
way the author seems to work.

bridgetteakabiit