Freedom for House-Elves (Was: Kreacher the Plot Device Elf)
Ceridwen
ceridwennight at hotmail.com
Wed Nov 29 01:27:09 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 162109
Ceridwen:
> > <snip>
> > ...I had hoped to say that it seems that elves have no other
option than to work as slaves. The suits their nature, whether this
nature is inborn or enchanted on them. They have no other recourse, no
place to go where they can get gainful employment to meet their needs.
Betsy Hp:
> Hmm, the way I see it, House-elves enjoy domestic work. They like
to cook and clean and seem to take pride in keeping a nice home. (I
tend to think Ron's comment that his family can't afford a house-elf
has more to do with the state of their home than a house-elf
market.) And generally, a good domestic can always find a job.
Ceridwen:
So, since they like to cook and clean, being domestic slaves suits
their natures. And yes, a good domestic is certainly a treasure.
Besty Hp:
> Really, the issue isn't the work IMO (nothing wrong with being a
cook or housekeeper in my book), but in the lack of equal choice. A
wizard may fire a house-elf (give him or her clothes), but a house-
elf cannot quit. (Remember, Dobby didn't leave the Malfoys. Harry
tricked Lucius into firing him.)
I think the house-elf solution is simply give the house-elves to
ability to quit. With the threat of a good house-elf being wooed
away by nicer work conditions (whatever those are to house-elves) I
think you'd find most wizards doing their best to keep their
particular house-elf content.
Ceridwen:
That might work. It would necessitate hiring rather than owning
house elves. But at the same time, for full-time employment, there
would be primarily the same old masters to serve, the wizards and
witches who already own house elves. This is a small pool to choose
from. I lived in a very small, isolated town for six or seven
years. People went from job to job, did as they pleased, quit or
were fired, and moved on, sometimes holding the same job four or five
times because there were no other jobs. Employers treated employees
poorly, fired them, hired new people practically off the street if
their schedule was compatible with the job more than if the person
was compatible to the position, and ended up firing and then, at some
much later date, re-hiring people they had fired because there were
no other people. I think that a temp agency or part-time service
provider, like the maid services that come to your home once a week
for a smaller fee than full-time, would be nice. Then someone like
Molly could have an elf-catered wedding for Bill and Fleur, or clean
up her home for a visit from the prospective in-laws without tiring
herself too much.
Ceridwen:
> > Harry's responsibilities toward Kreacher go beyond making sure he
is housed and fed. He also has to consider Kreacher's other options
in the world outside of his hereditary employment.
Betsy Hp:
> Why? Do you think Harry is going to keep Kreacher once the war is
over? Why wouldn't Harry let Kreacher allow Kreacher to seek work
with a family he'd actually enjoy working for once the danger is past?
Ceridwen:
No, I don't think Harry will keep Kreacher after LV's demise. That
would be the perfect time to hand him clothes and send him on his
merry way. But until then, he does have a responsiblity toward
Kreacher as his dependent.
Betsy Hp:
> That's part of the reason I think Harry was better off treating
Kreacher as a prisoner of war. There's an implied end to the
imprisonment. By treating him as a slave, the only end is Kreacher's
death. Which seems a bit bleak to me.
Ceridwen:
Even as a prisoner of war, Harry as his captor would have
responsibilities toward Kreacher. He would still be responsible for
his housing, food, medical, and morale. He would be expected to
allow Kreacher contact with his loved ones, but not to allow contact
with active enemy agents. To Kreacher, Harry's enemies are his loved
ones. It would be disasterous for the Order if Harry had to allow
contact between Kreacher and Narcissa or Bellatrix. Harry would also
be in charge of censoring Kreacher's contacts, both incoming and
outgoing, or seeing to it that this contact was censored.
Harry would also be able to work the prisoner. Nothing cruel and
unusual, and nothing that could compromise security, but work. It
keeps the prisoner active so that, during work hours at least, he is
not keeping himself busy by trying to contact enemy agents or
plotting or attempting escape. Kreacher could be sentenced to
gardening, digging holes where necessary, filling sandbags for a
flood, building a new hut for Hagrid, picking up litter on the side
of the road (under supervision), doing laundry, working in the
kitchen, farm work, or other jobs.
As a prisoner of war, it would be Kreacher's duty to try and escape.
He did what he could to get to the former Black sisters when he
belonged to Sirius, so perhaps Kreacher looks at things more the way
you do. But, in a POW setting, it wouldn't be out of place to shoot
Kreacher in the back if he does try to escape.
Ceridwen.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive