What turned Snape (Was: JKR site update SPOILERS)
zgirnius
zgirnius at yahoo.com
Sun Oct 1 03:24:22 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 158942
> > > Neri:
> > > Are you saying you don't think Snape owed a life debt to James
at all?
> > > Or that he did, but that this wasn't the reason he "turned"?
> > >
> >
> > Hickengruendler:
> >
> > The later.
>
> Neri:
> In this case Snape would have *two* motivations to "turn" Lily and
> his life debt to James. So even assuming we will find in Book 7 that
> he was in love with Lily, how can we ever know for sure what was the
> relative importance of each of these two motivations in his
decision?
>
> LOLLIPOPS+Life Debt seems to be a good option for JKR if she wants
to
> leave us with an ambiguous Snape even *after* the end of the series.
> It's possible, of course, that this is what she means to do. But if,
> as she once promised, after Book 7 we will know everything we need
to
> know and won't have any need for prequels, then shouldn't she give
> Snape a single motivation to "turn"?
zgirnius:
We have very little canon on how a life debt works. If LOLLIPOPS is
presented in Book 7 as the answer, it will BE the answer. Because
we'll never get any details on how the life-debt made Snape do it,
and we will therefore have no reason to suppose that it did, even if
at the present time such a speculation seems a reasonable extension
of things we arleady know.
If all we ever get, Snape's life-debt to James-wise is the
explanation Dumbledore gave Harry in PS/SS, I don't see how this will
make Snape ambiguous.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive