Blood Protection

[Donna]

No: HPFGUIDX 159105

 
 
 
 
> > a_svirn:
> To cause harm 
> > Voldemort needed to obtain a body first. As soon as he did, he 
> > caused harm.
> >
> 
> Hickengruendler:
> 
> Not at the Dursleys, no. He didn't. And are you sure, that Harry is 
> only safe inside the house? I thought he's safe as along as he was 
> around his relations. Meaning in school he couldn't be attacked by 
> Voldemort because of Dudley, (sadly, this did not protect him *from* 
> Dudley), and when he was shopping with Aunt Petunia, he couldn't be 
> attacked either. Of course this still didn't protect him *all* the 
> time, but at least more than just when he's in the house. I know that 
> it is left open so far, and that your interpretation could just as well 
> be true, but that's how I understood it. The Dementors where not sent 
> by Voldemort, and therefore they don't count as an counter-example for 
> Harry being endangered when a blood relative was around. Dumbledore 
> could not have forseen, that a ministry offical, who is not connected 
> to Voldemort, of all people would try to assinate Harry.


Donna:
I'm going by memory but it seems to me that Dumbledore said that as long as
Harry could call the Dursleys' house (location of Harry's blood relation) he
was protected until he reached the age of majority - 17.  That was the
reason Harry had to return to the Dursleys every year.
 
 

 Recent Activity
 28New Members
Visit Your Group 
SPONSORED LINKS
Harry potter hat 
Harry potter scarf 
Harry potter half-blood prince 
Harry potter book 
Harry potter party supply 
Yahoo! News
Odd News
You won't believe
it, but it's true
Yahoo! TV
Staying in tonight?
Check listings to
see what is on.
Y! GeoCities
Share Photos
Put your favorite
photos online.. 
 
 
 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]