Requiescat in Pace: Unforgivables
colebiancardi
muellem at bc.edu
Wed Aug 8 14:14:54 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 174808
DG wrote:
<snipping>
> And then, once he had Carrow in his custody, he turned it off, thus
> avoiding crossing the line from necessary force into torture.
>
> Agsin, I have absolutely zero problems with this. Harry. Never.
Tortures.
>
colebiancardi:
The Cruciatus Curse: per GoF - You don't need thumbscrews or knives
to torture someone if you can perform the Cruciatus Curse. p 215 US
ed hardcover
As a DE stated this, I think this is pretty much canon. If anyone
would know about torture, it is a DE
Your arguments aren't convincing me or others who believe that Harry
performed a legit UC called the Cruciatus Curse, whose only purpose is
to torture someone - perhaps it is to convince yourself, I don't know.
Whether it is for a second or prolonged, it is does what it is
supposed to do - torture someone.
Harry.Does.Torture
and he meant it, according to canon.
colebiancardi
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive