Snape, a Deatheater.
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sun Jan 21 22:05:33 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 164024
>
> Nikkalmati
>
> It doesn't matter, it doesn't matter! It only means he did not deliberately
promise to kill DD! That is what I mean; he would not under any
circumstances have made that promise, if he knew what it was,
unless he is not DDM or unless you accept that DD and Snape
already planned for Snape to kill DD. No
other explanation has been given IMHO which explains the UV.
Pippin:
Well..Narcissa wants a promise that Snape will kill Dumbledore if
necessary, but the vow itself could as easily be interpreted as
Snape swearing that he will die rather than kill Dumbledore. I
don't have any moral problems with that.
>
> Nikkalmati
>
> I don't see how we could possibly see that moment without
giving away Snape's true allegiance and feelings.
Pippin:
Neither the twitch, the argument in the forest, nor the anguished
moment outside Hagrid's hut gives away Snape's true allegiance and
feelings, yet I am sure that in the end we will know exactly why
Snape reacted as he did. JKR is perfectly capable of writing a
reaction scene without giving away a thing.
She touches on the investigation into the attacks without telling
us whether Snape is helping or hindering it, and in the same
way she could give us a scene where Snape is not clear on
what he's supposed to do -- and we wouldn't know whether
he is fishing for further details or hearing things for the
first time.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive