CHAPDISC: HBP 29, The Phoenix Lament
Ceridwen
ceridwennight at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 25 20:47:40 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 164253
Dungrollin's Discussion questions:
> 1. This chapter is a nice opportunity for JKR to show us a variety
of characters' reactions to the same emotional upheaval -
Dumbledore's death. Did any of their reactions particularly inspire
sympathy in you? Which character reacted most similarly to you? Is
that character one you normally sympathise or identify with?
Ceridwen:
Sympathy: Hagrid. Similar to my own reaction or what those would be
in similar situations: McGonagall and Slughorn.
> 2. (Take off your DDM!Snape hats for this one, please.) In this
chapter, McGonagall and Tonks ask the same questions that fans have
been asking for years, namely: what did Snape tell Dumbledore to make
him trust him? Do you think, given Lupin, McGonagall and Tonks's
astonishment at Harry's story, that *even if Snape really has*
betrayed the Order and rejoined Voldemort, there still must have been
more than a `tale of remorse' to how he hoodwinked Dumbledore? How do
you think ESE!Snape (or similar variants) could have convinced him?
What themes that the books have already visited would Snape's tale
(and the fact that it was fake) resonate with, and how could his
ability to fool Dumbledore reflect upon Harry's
story?
Ceridwen:
I try not to wear hats on the board: people might think I'm in a gang.
Yes, I do think there must have been more than a 'tale of remorse' to
convince Dumbledore of Snape's switch. Dumbledore offers mercy, he
offers second chances, but I believe he also watches quietly and
makes his assessments from his observations. I think the only way
Snape of other-than-DDM flavor would have convinced Dumbledore of his
sincerity would be for him to behave as if he really was remorseful -
not just in front o f DD, but at times when he thought DD wasn't
watching. No sneaking around, watching over his shoulder to see if
the Guy with the Beard was there.
> 3. Assuming Hermione's account of events in Snape's office is
accurate, what do you make of her and Luna's gullibility? Are you
annoyed that they didn't realise immediately that Snape had stupefied
Flitwick and try to stop him? Since Ron, Neville and Ginny weren't
much more use when confronted by the Peruvian Darkness Powder, and
only made it through the fight because of the Felix Felicis, have
your views on how useful the DA really was changed?
Ceridwen:
They weren't gullible. Snape was a teacher, and an Order member, and
he told them that Flitwick needed help. Hermione and Luna are not as
suspicious as Harry and wouldn't react in an automatically suspicious
way.
I think the DA did what it was intended to do: teach the practical
defensive spells and strategies that weren't being taught in class.
The ones who joined learned something, and worked together on their
spells much like Snape had them working together on spells in sixth
year DADA. Since a student was leading the club, that student
wouldn't have been able to teach how to deal with Peruvian Darkness
Powder, which was introduced to him and the readers a year later.
Harry taught what he knew and what he had researched, but even an
experienced teacher would not have been able to teach everything in
one school year.
> 4. What do you make of McGonagall saying (of Snape) "He must have
known a spell we didn't [
] After all, he was the Defence against the
Dark Arts teacher?" We all know Snape had been teaching potions for
fifteen years before that, so what do you make of this sudden respect
for his knowledge of DADA? Do you think the teaching posts confer
something special on their holders? Does this give us any clues as to
why Voldemort particularly wanted to have the DADA job? Or do you
think McGonagall could be alluding in some way to the curse?
Ceridwen:
I think she was speaking from hindsight. This wasn't spoken in the
middle of battle.
I don't think the post confers any special powers on its holder, or
anyone could be roped in off the street to teach. I think she was
merely saying that she would expect the DADA professor to know more
about spells like that and how to get around them than the
Transfiguration teacher would, perhaps because of special study in
that field. Heh. Maybe she wondered why he hadn't been tapped for
the post when they couldn't get anyone before.
> 5. Molly doesn't give one single sign that she cares at all that
Dumbledore's dead, she doesn't react when McGonagall assures Arthur
that it's true, nor does she ask Harry or the others if they're all
right; she only has eyes for Bill. Do you find that surprising? How
do you interpret her different reactions to the dramas at the ends of
CoS, GoF and HBP, and how do they reflect upon her assertion in OotP
that Harry is as good as her son?
Ceridwen:
I would have found it more surprising if she had left Billy laying
there to take part in the discussion. This is her son, her eldest,
horribly mutilated and with his fate in question. It's possible that
the discussion was only peripheral noise to her through much of the
scene, like the chatter from a television when Real Life intrudes on
the rest of us.
> 6. In ch5 p92 (UK ed.) Molly says (of Bill and Fleur) "It was the
same last time he was powerful, people eloping right left and centre
" yet Lupin seems here to be an exception, holding out against this
all-too-human reaction in times of war. Do you find this consistent
with his character? Given the close friends he has lost, do you
understand him wanting to keep Tonks at arm's length, or do you agree
with Molly that he's being ridiculous? How does his behaviour
regarding Tonks compare with Harry's later break-up with Ginny?
Ceridwen:
Lupin's reaction is understandable. He probably didn't have a close
girlfriend the first time around for the same reasons that he is
keeping Tonks at arms' length, so didn't marry. He may have resigned
himself to a solitary life because of his affliction. He doesn't
seem to put himself forward to people that much, which I read as due
to his being a werewolf. He keeps a low profile. And after seeing
Greyback, I can see why he might not want to even give the impression
he's anything like him.
But, Molly's right. Tonks is a big girl and is capable of assessing
the risks and the benefits of a relationship with Lupin. His
reaction is ridiculous. He needs to try it out, at least, to see if
they both feel the same way weeks or months later. Sometimes, just
trying it out would give them both an idea of what such a
relationship might be like, and would give them both more of an idea
of wheter or not it would work. Of course, he might think that would
just be getting his hopes up to be dashed.
I don't think the Remus/Tonks 'ship reflects the Harry/Ginny 'ship at
all. Harry didn't try to keep her away, his only concern was what
his best friend, Ron, might think. Harry broke up with Ginny because
he wants to protect her (careful, Harry, she didn't like Dean helping
her through the door), and because he will be on a secret assignment
where he doesn't need the baggage of a relationship.
> 7. Do you think that the fact that Dumbledore's portrait is
sleeping peacefully and looking untroubled is significant? If so,
what do you think it signifies, and if JKR had wanted to signify the
opposite, how do you think she would have done it?
Ceridwen:
I think it is significant, or JKR wouldn't have mentioned it in as
much detail as she did. I think she is trying to show that
Dumbledore died at peace and that there were no loose ends. If it
had been any other way, she might have mentioned a slightly disturbed
expression, or a sad expression, if she bothered to mention anything
more than the new addition to the portraits at all.
> 8. What do you make of McGonagall's statement about closing the
school: "
I must say that Professor Dumbledore's murder is more
disturbing to me than the idea of Slytherin's monster living
undetected in the bowels of the castle
" Do you find this statement
surprising? Do you agree with it? Do you think it might reflect the
fact that she was a student at Hogwarts the first time the Chamber
opened? Do you think it reflects JKR's opinion?
Ceridwen:
I think she took Dumbledore's death more personally than she took the
Basilisk, though the Basilisk did distress her. I'm not sure if
McGonagall was around when the Chamber was opened. Wasn't she
a "spry seventy" in 1991? That would have put her at 22 if the
Chamber was opened in 1943.
I think that maybe JKR is more disturbed by Dumbledore's death than
by the Basilisk, since it was meant to be shocking. But I don't
think McGonagall has moved into Dumbledore's place as JKR's
mouthpiece.
> 9. What do you make of Slughorn's reaction to Dumbledore's death,
his shock at Snape's culpability, his ambivalence about the school
reopening, and his seeming reluctance that the students should stay
for the funeral? How does this compare with his manner with
Dumbledore in chapter four? If the school reopens, do you think he
will stay on as potions master and head of Slytherin, and do you
think Dumbledore's death will affect his decision?
Ceridwen:
Slughorn's reaction was one of the two I think might mirror mine in a
similar situation. I would be trying to wrap my head around the
events, trying to understand (I thought I knew him!), and not wanting
to commit myself to any new ventures until I could ascertain more
calmly what should be done.
I think he'll stay on. The school needs him. I think he'll be glad
to be gone again, though, as soon as a replacement can be found.
> 10. Do you think Harry was right not to tell McGonagall where he
went with Dumbledore? Would you have had the courage (or
stubbornness) to do the same at his age? Do you think that he did
what Dumbledore would have wanted? McGonagall will almost certainly
ask Dumbledore's portrait where he took Harry when it wakes up; what
do you think it will tell her? Since all the portraits are sworn to
help the current head, do you think they will tell her about the
horcruxes? If they refused, do you think she has the potential to
turn into an Umbridge, or worse?
Ceridwen:
First, I don't know if I would have had the courage to refuse
McGonagall the way Harry did. I do think he did the right thing.
Telling a secret like that just because a person is over-wrought
isn't a good idea. Harry may think it over and change his mind, but
it isn't a good idea to just start telling everything. You may find,
on later reflection, that maybe it wasn't a good idea after all.
The portraits may tell her something. But I don't think they'll tell
her right off if they ever do. Harry's mission has nothing to do
with running the school, it's Order business.
I don't think McGonagall could ever be like Umbridge.
> 11. Do you find it surprising that McGonagall didn't ask how Harry
& co. knew that Malfoy was in the room of requirement? Harry didn't
tell her what he knows about the Unbreakable Vow either (despite the
fact that it didn't have anything to do with the Horcruxes). Do you
think she will find out, and if she did how do you think she would
react? What story about Malfoy and Snape should Harry be able to
piece together from the information he has?
Ceridwen:
I think McGonagall may have known that Harry was following Malfoy
around, so might have had some idea of where to expect him to be. It
was a large part of the book, after all, and she was his Head of
House.
I think that she, and other Order members, will find out at some
point about the Unbreakable Vow. I don't know what they'll think. I
do think it will be part of the puzzle of Snape in DH.
I don't think Harry will actively be trying to piece together
anything about Malfoy and Snape. But I do think he'll start to see
discrepancies. The more discrepancies he sees, the more he'll try to
put things together. I can't imagine what he'll come up with based
on what he has. He may fight against anything sympathetic toward
Snape if his evidence starts to go in that direction, though.
> 12. Hagrid is inconsolable; did you find his reaction to
Dumbledore's death moving? We don't get to see what he thinks of
Snape's apparent treachery, do you think this omission is
conspicuous? Hagrid insists that he's staying whether the school
opens or not, because Hogwarts is his home, even though his hut has
just been burned down. Do you think he only wants to stay because of
Grawp, or do you think he might have another reason that we don't
know about?
Ceridwen:
I found Hagrid's reaction to be very moving. I usually get a little
impatient with his grief over things like Norbert's leaving. But,
he's a sensitive soul, and his grief was pure.
I don't know if he knows something more about Snape than he's
telling. He may only have room for grief so soon after the death.
But, yes, the omission was conspicuous.
Hogwarts is Hagrid's home, and has been since he was a young teen. I
think, too, that he's staying close to Dumbledore, though Grawp might
enter into it: responsibility at least since he was the one to bring
his brother there. I think he also has a duty to Hogwarts that he
takes seriously. His job as groundskeeper doesn't end just because
the school might not reopen in the fall.
> 13. McGonagall will refer the decision to close the school to the
governors; do you think that we have any canon to go on in guessing
whether Hogwarts will reopen or not? Do you think that JKR ought to
tell us one way or another before book 7?
Ceridwen:
I can see the Governors perhaps wanting to hear evidence for and
against reopening the school since the protections were gotten
around. But earlier canon suggests to me that Hogwarts will reopen.
It reopened after Myrtle died as far as we know, and it didn't close
after the Chamber was opened again in Harry's second year. I do
think they'll want to do something with that Vanishing cabinet -
either get rid of the one on school grounds, or obtain the other one,
so there will be no passage into the school that way.
I don't think JKR should tell us whether the school opens or not
until the book is released.
> 14. Do you find any of the characters' reactions to Dumbledore's
death suspicious? Do you think that we may find out something in book
7 which will make us view this hospital-wing scene in a different
light (even if you can't imagine what it is yet)?
Ceridwen:
I take anything with a grain of salt where JKR's writing is
concerned. Everyone seemed to be grieving in their own ways, but I
think that sooner or later someone is going to start questioning and
poking around if nothing else. I do think we'll have to revisit the
hospital scene, though right now, I'm not sure why. Maybe there are
clues we missed the first time.
> 15. Did it surprise you that there was no mention of the
Headmasters' and Headmistresses' portraits' reactions to McGonagall
asking where Harry went with Dumbledore? They've often been vocal in
the past when Harry and Dumbledore were alone together; is their
silence in this scene conspicuous? How do you think Phineas Nigellus,
for example, reacted to news of Dumbledore's death, and when did he
hear?
Ceridwen:
No, I didn't notice the lack of comment from the portraits.
McGonagall hadn't asked for their advice. Maybe they don't know how
far they can go with her. Dumbledore seemed easygoing with them.
I would love to hear the portraits' reactions, though. Especially
Phineas Nigellus's! I hope we get that scene.
> 16. "And he knew, without knowing how he knew it, that the phoenix
had gone, had left Hogwarts for good, just as Dumbledore had left the
school, had left the world
had left Harry." Did you find this
ending to the chapter poignant? Does it wear off after the sixth re-
read? If we see Fawkes again in book 7, do you think we will get to
know him as a character in his own right, or will he always be
associated with and symbolise Dumbledore?
Ceridwen:
I think the ending is in keeping with the events of that chapter. It
doesn't have the same impact after the sixth re-read, but it still
fits.
Fawkes will always be associated with Dumbledore.
Ceridwen, thanking Dungrollin for a good chapter discussion.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive