Question about the prophecy and a thought about Ginny
Dana
ida3 at planet.nl
Tue Jul 3 05:28:52 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 171165
Sneeboy2:
> I'll just jump in here and say that DD confiding any information to
> Snape requires a different level of trust, because he knows that
> Snape is also has Voldemort's confidence. Sending one of your own
> into the enemy camp indicates a pretty high level of trust. If
> Snape is the one who healed DD's hand, and the one he wanted to see
> after he'd drunk the potion, then Snape's knowledge of DD's actions
> outside Hogwart's could be second only to Harry's. DD told
> McGonagall nothing about his actions outside Hogwarts. That's some
> pretty special trust.
<snip>
Dana:
Sorry but that is assuming without any canon proof that Snape knew
what DD was doing when he injured his hand and that DD told Snape
what he was doing that night. Canon actually indicates that he did
not tell Snape what he was doing. Why? Well first of all Snape tells
both Bella and Narcissa in Spinner's End that DD had sustained a
serious injury to his hand, that DD is getting old and that his
reflexes are slower. This might not be of real importance to them but
Snape is telling it like it hasn't much importance at all, as if it
isn't crucial information the enemy could use. Telling them makes me
think he told LV too and it makes me think that Snape didn't know
what had injured DD's hand and why it would be important to keep this
information from the enemy. Telling your enemy that the one LV ever
feared is weak and injured is a big no no but besides that LV would
know what would cause such an injury.
Just like Snape knew instantly what hurt Draco in the bathroom as he
recognized the effects of his own curse and so would LV. I am pretty
confident about my theory that it was Snape's information that made
LV chance his mind about going after Harry and why he changed
directive to take DD out first. Snape might not have known he was
giving LV more information then he actually should because he didn't
know that it would tip LV off that DD was on to his horcruxes and
therefore I do not believe Snape knows anything about it. DD as he
explains about the diary tells Harry that Lucius did not know the
diary contained a soul piece of his master and that he just thought
LV had put some real dark magic into it. There is no support in canon
that DD shared his suspicion about the diary with Snape.
Also DD believed Snape to be asleep when he and Harry got to the
tower. That is a pretty strange assumption if you would have that
person on alert in case you need him to cure you for whatever you
were to encounter in the cave.
DD trusted Snape to have returned to the side of good and just like
Lupin, he truly trusted Snape would only go back to LV to pretend he
was on their side. Only problem for me is Snape's actions, in OotP,
do not support this idea because Snape lost Harry out of his sight
for more then 5 hours before he alerted the Order and Snape did not
claim to DD that he thought Harry to be safe in Umbridge care and
therefore could not get to the DoM, he did not state that he had no
way of knowing that Harry would find a way to the DoM. No, he
actually tells DD that he had no way of knowing Harry would still
believe Sirius to be in danger. Do you really believe this to be
true? With everything that happened between Snape and Harry that
year? Snape refused to help Harry further to learn occlumency but
Harry somehow should still believe that Snape WOULD help him if he
asked for his help? Or that Snape without any feedback indeed checked
out that Sirius was safe? How would Harry know Sirius was safe
without Snape ever telling him? Even if he believed Snape would check
it out without any feedback Harry would not know Snape would have
been successful in contacting Sirius. So to me that was a lie. Snape
lied about why it took him so long to respond after Harry had giving
him the warning. And if Harry had not stalled Lucius and his gang as
they did, then the Order had arrived to late and this while Snape
knew about LV's plan being set into action before Harry ever left for
the DoM. Also isn't it strange that Snape is assumed to have alerted
the Order to thwart Lucius from succeeding but just a few weeks later
he takes a vow to protect his only son? And he tells the wife of the
person he helped put in Azkaban in short that he helped putting him
there and therefore was the real cause for LV's anger when he makes
his claim about helping dispose of Black? Are we to believe Snape is
really that stupid to give up his cover because he just wants to take
some pride in helping to kill Sirius by telling them a lie that could
expose him as a traitor? I think not.
Also althroughout HBP DD was counting on Snape to take care of things
concerning Draco as he tells Draco that he had given Snape the order
to watch him but Snape failed to follow this order because there was
that pesky vow that prevented Snape from taking real actions against
Draco. DD indeed trusted Snape and why he gave him specific
assignments and Snape failed him three times.
Sneeboy2:
That's certainly part of it, but something tells me there's more to
the story, and we'll find out what in DH. One thing is certain: if
Snape is a spy for DD, he must be giving him some information about
Voldemort. We don't know the quality of that information, but if it
was always wrong, I'd think DD would get suspicious. IF some of it
turned out to be right, and aided DD, that in itself would be a cause
for trust. This is speculation, but it's part of the definition of
spying to bring back info about the enemy, so I don't think it's wild
speculation.
<snip>
Dana:
The only reason that there seems to be more to the story is DD's
determination when he declares his trust in Snape. It is just, to me,
the unwillingness to believe that it was only Snape's story of
remorse that made DD trust Snape had returned to the right side. But
DD specifically states in HBP that he believed that Snape's remorse
WAS the reason for his return. Wanting to believe that there is more
to it is in my opinion wanting there to be a bigger reason for
Snape's return and his remorse and therefore more to DD's trust in
Snape. Canon only tells us this and DD is no longer here to support
any other type of version of why Snape returned and it was Snape's
return that initiated DD's trust. The one thing you call certain
isn't certain at all because in OotP DD never claims to Harry that he
knew what LV was up to because of information Snape got from LV or
that any type of information coming from Snape came directly from LV.
DD only tells Harry about the information that Snape found out
through Harry. Wouldn't it have been a great way for DD to proof
Snape was on their side by stating Snape was working tirelessly to
help the Order? Everyone knew Snape was so-called pretending to still
be a DE. Snape's information did not help the Order to keep one step
ahead of LV neither in OotP or HBP. The Order was running after the
facts and therefore there is no proof in canon that Snape did
anything other then confirm what the Order already knew. If the Order
would have know that LV was still after the prophecy and was going to
use Harry to get it, instead of them believing LV would have no way
of getting to Harry and was not going to get it himself then there
would have been someone guarding the MoM as a precaution. More Order
Members would have guarded the premises of Hogwarts to make sure
Harry would not get out. But there was no Order activity anywhere,
why? Because I believe DD trusted Snape to secure Harry's safety and
he didn't.
Sneeboy2:
> I don't disagree, but to be fair, his actions, or lack thereof,
went against everything he'd been raised to believe from birth. It
also put his life and his family's lives in danger. To me, having
qualms about committing murder in a situation like that is not a sign
of someone who's lacking guts, but of someone who has a heart.
Dana:
If Draco was showing compassion in that moment then why did he not
react at all when Snape kills DD? Why did he not try to stop Snape
killing DD but let himself be shoved out of the way. Why did he not
start yelling that it would be wrong to kill? Because Draco was
scared that the DEs would kill him on sight. Draco did not care if DD
died he just could not do it himself. Sure that is a good thing that
you can't take another humans life for your own personal gain but it
doesn't proof Draco did not kill DD out of the goodness of his heart.
Proofs indeed Draco's heart is not truly ever so evil. But where is
Draco compassion in feeling sorry he almost killed two students?
Draco failed his mission because he did not have the nerve to kill
another human being not because he did no longer want DD death. That
is a good thing don't get me wrong but it was not because Draco
realized what he was doing was wrong.
JMHO
Dana
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive