[HPforGrownups] Re: Why Harry Potter (or his scar) is NOT a Horcrux

[BrwNeil at aol.com]

No: HPFGUIDX 171590

 
 
In a message dated 7/11/2007 4:56:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
justcarol67 at yahoo.com writes:

>Carol, conceding that Harry *could* have a soul bit in his scar  but
>not believing that such a soul bit makes the scar a Horcrux  or
>requires Harry to sacrifice himself, leaving no one with "the power  to
>vanquish the Dark Lord" since the Chosen One would be  dead






Neil

If Harry is a  Horcrux, then Voldemort is really stupid.  Why would you put a 
part of your  soul in someone who you were trying to destroy and if you were 
so foolish,  why would you continue to try and destroy the person?
 
How many  times has Voldemort tried to kill Harry in the series thus far; SS, 
CS, GF  and OotP?  Not once did he show any concern for a part of him 
residing in  the boy.  Plus, how is Harry suppose to destroy himself and then  still 
be around to kill Voldemort.  In my opinion many people are trying  very hard 
to make the story more complicated than it is.  Dumbledore  and Harry listed 
the Horcrux items several times in HB.  
 
Neil



************************************** Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]