Why Harry Potter (or his scar) is NOT a Horcrux

drax_orion Adam.Chase at charter.net
Fri Jul 13 14:33:50 UTC 2007


No: HPFGUIDX 171660

In a message dated 7/11/2007 4:56:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
justcarol67 at ... writes:

> > Carol, conceding that Harry *could* have a soul bit in his scar
> > but not believing that such a soul bit makes the scar a Horcrux
> > or requires Harry to sacrifice himself, leaving no one with "the
> > power to vanquish the Dark Lord" since the Chosen One would be
> > dead

Neil
> <Snip>
> How many  times has Voldemort tried to kill Harry in the series thus
> far; SS, CS, GF and OotP?  Not once did he show any concern for a
> part of him residing in the boy.  Plus, how is Harry suppose to
> destroy himself and then still be around to kill Voldemort.


Drax:
Well keep in mind that Tom Riddle (still not publically known as
Voldemort) was the one who tried to kill Harry in CoS, so he would not
know about Harry being a horcrux, if he is one of course.  It is very
possible that Harry is a horcrux too, and that Voldemort will not die
at the end.  It is possible that a total of 5 horcruxes wil be
destroyed, and when Harry destroys Voldemort's body his spirit will be
somehow forced to merge with the piece inside Harry, forever forcing
Voldemort to suffer the pain he received when attempting to possess
Harry in OotP.  I do not really agree with this theory because Harry
would also likely wallow in pain because of it too.





More information about the HPforGrownups archive