Snape/Lily love or obsession
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 26 01:46:03 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 172874
>
> Julie:
> What obsessive side? The obsessive side where he stalked her around
> town, where he begged her over and over to take him back, where
he left
> dead bunnies at her doorstep? Seriously though...
> <SNIP>
>> The most repeated piece of evidence is Snape as a TEN YEAR OLD
CHILD
> watching Lily "greedily." Greedy is not a pretty word in general,
but it has
> several meanings, and here it's connotation--"longingly" is
innocuous. Snape
> is watching something that he wants for himself, or wants to be a
part of.
> But which is it, because a "stalker" wants that *person* for
himself, almost
> always for some sort of romantic/sexual gratification. So Snape is
a child
> stalker, a miniature pervert?
<SNIP>
Alla:
No, I find the word used just the possible sign for future
developments, not a pretty one, no, but if used alone of course I
won't accuse ten year old of stalking.
The strongest evidence to me of obsession is Snape searching Sirius
room, taking a **private** letter from one friend to another,
tearing apart that letter, taking with him the part where Lily
signature was AND in addition to this, doing something so much
creepier - tearing apart the photograph that does not belong to him
either and **KEEPING** it.
I am half expecting as I mentioned before to see the police finding
many pictures of Lily in his room
Julie:
<SNIP>
> So, love or obsession, you ask. Both, I say. First love, and
later, on top
> of that
> love, obsession with his chosen path to redemption.
Alla:
Both, maybe. But I disagree that creepy signs are not there.
> Lisa:
<BIG SNIP>
> But what did he do, when faced presented with the
> opportunity to harm someone he found annoying? He attempted
murder-
> by-Lupin.
<HUGE SNIP>
Alla:
Attempted murder is not in canon and judging by Lily's reaction, I
would really say it was not that IMO.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive