Further Notes on Literary Uses of Magic and Anti-Globalization in Harry Potter
horridporrid03
horridporrid03 at yahoo.com
Tue May 1 01:21:13 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 168153
> >>dan:
> <snip>
> The DA begins as an educational organization - practicing arts
> forbidden them, all with the purpose of teaching students how to
> defend themselves from dangers they know are real, and many of their
> families know are real, but which the state denies - just as the
> state denied for decades global warming and so forth. In Harry
> Potter, the evil of segragation, nationalist chauvanism, racism and
> extremism, as signified by the DE, sharing as it does elements of
> all these, all elements practiced in the rest of the witchwizard
> world to a lesser extent - as demonstrated in the history of
> creature rights, for example, in OotP - are tackled head on by the
> students. Their story is the story, again I say, of the raw
> emotional integrity of youth, which stumbles in its unpracticed way
> toward verity.
> <snip>
Betsy Hp:
Since montims and Pippin took on the first and third paragraphs of
this post, I'll tackle the second. <g>
The problem I see with the DA, and with the "good guys" in the
Potterverse in totality, is their inherent hypocrisy. They,
unfortunately, share a lot of the evils you assign (correctly, IMO)
to the Deatheaters. Yes, it's a bit more benign, but in some ways
its very banality makes it more dangerous.
The DA *was* segragated. No Slytherins were allowed, and no one who
didn't agree to be completely loyal to Harry (and Dumbledore) was
allowed. There was even a certain taint of "Hitler Youth" to the
ruthless understanding that students would stand against their family
if need be (Marietta).
Harry is a slave owner. And he's not only not afraid of using his
slave, he forces the slave to work against a family he loves. (Let's
all imagine Lucius forcing Dobby to help him take down Harry. How
would that come across?) Both Harry and Ron enjoy using magic
against a powerless squib. Hermione calls a Centaur a horse without
a blink. All three children are easily assuming their roles as the
elite of their world.
This all occurs after the DA, yes. But the exclusive and controlling
nature of the DA foreshadows, I think, the rather distasteful path
the Trio are heading down in HBP.
JKR does do a beautiful job showing the raw emotionalism of youth.
But I think she more shows us the *lack* of integrity and the danger
of hypocrisy, rather than truth, such emotionalism leads to. (The
way Hermione deals with her feelings for Ron encapsulates the
problems with emotional youth, IMO.)
The billion dollar question for me is whether JKR is doing this on
purpose, or whether this stuff is sneaking in under her radar.
Betsy Hp
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive