The remaining Horcruxes....
zanooda2
zanooda2 at yahoo.com
Sun May 20 22:49:48 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 169020
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Tandra" <tkjones9 at ...> wrote:
<snip>
> Now, aren't we to believe that R.A.B destroyed the locket? So why
> does he count this one? Besides that, wouldn't he have had to use
> one of them for his return in GoF? So wouldn't that just leave 2?
> The book was destroyed, the ring, the locket by R.A.B and having to
> use one in GoF leave us with 2, no?
zanooda:
Harry cannot disregard the locket just because RAB wrote he intended
to distroy it. Harry needs to be 100% sure.
I don't think LV "used" any of his Horcruxes to come back in GoF.
Horcruxes just prevent the part of LV's soul remaining in his body
from passing on in case the body is destroyed. Horcruxes function
like anchors, not like spare parts. That's how I understand it,
anyway. So, IMO, the four H-xes remain.
> Tandra:
> I'm also not sure if I can see the snake as one. IDK as much as he
> "loves" the snake would you trust an animal with part of your soul?
> But that leads me to the Harry being a Horcrux idea. <snip>
> So, that then plays into the idea that Harry has to die in the last
> book.
zanooda:
I don't like Nagini!Horcrux idea either. As for Harry!Horcrux, yes,
I'm in this camp, but if it turns out to be true, I'm sure that JKR
will find the way around it and Harry will survive, even though he
will be ready to sacrifice himself. If Harry dies, I'll take it
really, really hard ...
> Tandra:
> Please feel free to pick it all apart :-)
zanooda, taking Tandra on her(?) word :-)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive