Responses to Marietta
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Sat May 26 20:56:12 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 169328
> Carol responds:
> <HUGE SNIP>
> Ah, the heart of the matter. Hermione's hex *didn't* deter Marietta
or
> anyone else from reporting the group to Umbridge (though it might
have
> done so if she'd told them about it!) All it did was reveal the
> traitor after the fact--and punish her long after the action was
> committed. If she were going to punish and humiliate her for a week
or
> so, fine, perhaps, though the usual ostracism for snitches would
have
> served the purpose equally well. But it didn't "neutralize the
> traitor." It only silenced her after the fact. (Shacklebolt's Memory
> Charm silenced her permanently.)
>
> Your second paragraph sums it up beautifully: Hermione should have
> cast a hex that wouldn't let a traitor open his or her mouth. *That*
> would have been a deterrent, not a punishment--more effective and a
> lot less cruel.
<SNIP>
Alla:
Yep, she should have done that in my view , but my point is that the
fact that she did not do that does not make her bad strategist, just
not the ideal one in my opinion. And that has nothing to do with
desire to
diminish good side mistakes either actually ( in general reply). It
has everything to do with me thinking that while Hermione's planning
could have been better, it was not that bad. Actually, I will quote
Lanval here:
Lanval:
<SNIP>
> And you bring up the exact point why it was so important for the
hex
> to manifest itself. Umbridge acted without hesitating, which was
bad
> news for the DA. Had she however waited, then every member of the
DA
> would have known by the sight of Marietta's face that they had been
> betrayed, and who it was. Not only would they have refrained from
> assembling, they would have been spared the agonizing ordeal of
> suspecting each other. (Peter? Sirius? Remus? does that ring a
bell?
> It did for Hermione, I'm sure. ).
><SNIP>
Alla:
While I think that casting hex that would not have let traitor open
her mouth would have been the **ideal** solution, which Hermione did
not come up with, I think that the underlying reason that lanval
describes is **also** admirable and makes her a good enough
strategist and would have let everybody know who is the traitor and
nothing lilke long collaboration with Umbridge would have been
possible.
JMO of course,
Alla, who is so happy to see Lanval back :)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive