JKR's intent
horridporrid03
horridporrid03 at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 2 22:22:55 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 178799
> >>Prep0strus:
> > <snip>
> > The assumption of star athletes being male is one that comes from
> > the real world. People are bringing their biases with them into
> > the story. Slytherins are created by JKR.
> >>Pippin:
> The argument I've heard is that if JKR wanted us to think the
> Slytherins were moral, she'd have made them more sympathetic. That
> is a real world assumption about characters in fiction.
Betsy Hp:
IMO, if JKR wanted the Slytherins to be moral, she'd have written
them as moral. So again, it's what JKR provided not what the reader
brought to the table. Weirdly enough, my problem was that I found
the Slytherin's too sympathetic to believe they were supposed to be
the immoral bad guys.
So, to play off your example, it's like I assumed the quidditch
player named Robin was a woman, and argued that of course women could
play quidditch and look at all the RL woman athletes. Only in the
end, Robin was a man and all my arguments were moot.
> >>Adam:
> > If JKR wanted to show Slytherins as equal to other members of
> > society, or even as a morally neutral group, yes, she failed.
> > The fact that we have this discussion supports the failure.
> >>Pippin:
> If she wanted to show that it's easy to overlook virtue when it's
> not presented in a sympathetic light, she succeeded. Harry's story
> itself is ample demonstration of that.
Betsy Hp:
Why? Because readers couldn't see any virtue in Harry? That
confuses me. I'd guess Snape as the non-sympathetic holder of hidden
virtue. Which he almost, sort of, was. If you squinted. It seemed
more to me that he was broken by the guilt of what his naturally bad
self (ie Slytherin) did and then followed the orders of Dumbledore
(the virtue of Gryffindor) in an attempt to atone. Which, going by
his not being present with the blessed dead, didn't really work.
Though Harry admired his pluck in the end.
> >>Pippin:
> If you prefer to see the Slytherins as a confusing exception rather
> than a subtle proof, it's okay by me <g>
> If Regulus sacrificing his life for his House Elf, Slughorn
> duelling with Voldemort, and Snape keeping his cover to the death
> are not proof of good Slytherins, I have to say you're setting the
> bar for being a good Slytherin awfully high. I sure haven't done
> anything like that, and I'd like to think I'm a good person.
Betsy Hp:
The bar was set by JKR. And Slughorn, Snape and Regulus didn't push
their house up high enough to reach. So no banner in the RoR and
Slytherins banned from taking part on the good side in the final
battle. And Regulus wasn't among the blessed dead either that I
recall.
> >>Pippin:
> Did Shakespeare fail as a writer because it took a few hundred
> years for people to notice that those vulgar entertainments he
> wrote to make money were also literary works of subtlety and
> power?
Betsy Hp:
No. Because subtlety wasn't all he had. No one had to parse his
play to bits to figure out Romeo had fallen in love with Juliet. <g>
> >>Betsy Hp:
> > What text shows that McGonagalls read of the Slytherins was wrong?
> >>Pippin:
> The text that shows them not doing what she said they would do,
> sabotage the resistance or take arms against the defenders.
Betsy Hp:
Um... because she kicked them out before they could sabotage. Except
for...
> >>Pippin:
> Three stay behind to go after Harry, but that does not affect
> the defense of the castle at all.
Betsy Hp:
Because they failed to nab Harry, which, considering that a big part
of the defense of the castle was to keep Harry safe ("Give me Harry
Potter...") their actions could be defined as both sabotage and
taking up arms against the defenders.
> >>Pippin:
> And despite what Voldemort says, we don't see any Slytherins who
> left the castle on his side.
Betsy Hp:
Well, they're not all that brave, are they? <g>
> >>Pippin:
> Lucius was a member of the Hogwarts board of governors until the
> end of CoS. He had enough influence to get Dumbledore suspended.
> <snip>
Betsy Hp:
Only *after* several students were brutally attacked and nearly
killed and no progress was made in finding the culprit. And the
suspension didn't last, and IIRC, Lucius lost a lot of political
power with that play. (Didn't he get kicked off the board?) So it's
not like Lucius was displaying an awesome amount of power there.
> >>Pippin:
> Oh. Oh, no. *Now* I get it. Thank you, thank you, thank you. I
> think I finally see what you're getting at. Yeah, if I squint and
> look at it in a funny way, there's this weird, broken limping quest
> story that either didn't end or ended all wrong.
> <snip of an example of another weird and wrong quest journey>
Betsy Hp:
I totally agree that the Potter series is not what I'd call a
successful hero's journey. For one, Harry doesn't learn anything,
and for another, nothing changes, IMO. (A brilliantly happy ending
and an inhumanly perfect mentor isn't a part of the quest journey
either. I think you were thinking romantic comedy, maybe?)
But I think JKR would say that's what she was writing. I think she'd
say Harry learned about death, and I think she'd say that he changed
the world by defeating Voldemort and putting Slytherin in its place.
And then she'd burble on about "realism" and how mean people suck
(Slytherin) but you can't get rid of them and that's why they still
exist at Hogwarts. But they're safely diluted now, so all is well.
> >>Pippin:
> <snip>
> House Elves will be freed when the House Elves want freedom, and
> when wizards realize what a burden their mastery is. The Houses
> will unite when the children want unity, and when the adults realize
> what a burden their discord is.
> <snip>
Betsy Hp:
But that is a tale for another time, about another hero, to be told
by a different bard. Harry's story is done and he is at rest. <g>
IOWs, it sounds like a story worth reading, but it's not the one told
in the Potter series. It's not a story JKR was interested in
telling. So she didn't.
Betsy Hp
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive