Moody's death (was: Dumbledore's authority WAS: Re: Fees for Harry)

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 179450

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Renee" <rvink7 at ...> wrote:
<BIG SNIP>
> What this does make clear, is that it's very hard to run from a war
> altogether. But those who don't have the heart to act as bait
> certainly get a chance to do something less hopeless than marching 
to
> certain death. They do have a choice.

Alla:

Yes.

Renee:
 Just like the people in the
> Seven Potters episode, actually (except for Mundungus Fletcher, one
> might argue). They take the risk willingly, they know what could
> happen, and I fail to see the resemblance with pigs for slaughter. 
I
> see nothing in the text that tells me they were coerced to 
participate.  
>  <snip>

Alla:

I am not arguing that they were coerced to participate, of course 
not. What I am arguing is that Dumbledore put their lifes in the 
risk that could have been avoided  **because of that particular 
plan**, that's all.

Even at war, if commander can avoid the army of the enemy waiting to 
ambush their forces durin the war operation, isn't the duty of the 
commander  to do so?

OF COURSE there is always a possibility that those same troops will 
be killed during next operation, of course.

But I believe that commander should not do idiotic things if 
possible IMO.


Like as I said , at least battle of Hogwarts had reason, reason I 
can understand and I see why it should have happened?

This - no way, if Harry could leave in simpler and safer ways. IMO 
of course.


 JMO,

Alla.