Andromeda as good Slytherin WAS: Disappointment
starview316
starview316 at yahoo.ca
Mon Oct 1 16:24:55 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 177615
> Carol:
> However, she must be in
> > the story for a reason, and the only reason I can think of is to
> show
> > that not all Slytherins are evil.
> She's clearly a foil (in the sense
> > of a character who mirrors and contrasts with another character)
to
> > both her sisters. (How nice that the good sister is the middle
one
> and
> > not the youngest, in contrast to the tale of the three brothers,
> which
> > follows the standard fairytale formula of youngest equals best.)
>
> Magpie:
<snip>
> She seems pretty good via inference. She may have been in
> Slytherin. I'm not denying these things. I'm saying I think Adam
has
> a perfectly reasonably reaction in saying: Her? She's supposed to
> counteract all the negative Slytherins he sees? The one who is
> barely on page?
Amy:
It'd probably be better to ask Adam himself about this, but I don't
know what's meant by Andromeda's counteracting the negative
Slytherins we see. In that she's supposed to be seen as a Slytherin
whose pleasant and on the side of light because that's what she
believes in?
We don't know Andromeda, though. She's barely on the page. The little
we have about her in canon indicates she did fine with her family
until she married Ted Tonks, which put her on the outs -- for all we
know, she followed the trend of the other Slytherins we DO know, and
let love lead her away from the bad side, even if she kept a nasty
personality.
I don't see how this is supposed to make her less negative than the
others, and I see even less why it should matter. The fact is that
from the little we know of her, Andromeda IS firmly on the good side,
by standards of canon and fandom alike. She's not seen negatively in
the large scheme of things. Her personality has absolutely no bearing
on this; yet from the comments of both Sirius and Slughorn, she was a
Slytherin.
> Carol:
> > Carol, who said nothing at all about Andromeda as "poster child"
> > nineteen years later and notes that the future of Slytherin lies
> with
> > Scorpius Malfoy's generation
>
> Magpie:
> Except that's what Adam was rather asking for was a poster child
for
> an admirable and likable Slytherin--which is why Snape and Regulus
> and Phineas and Slughorn and the Malfoys didn't suffice for him. I
> was starting from what he was asking for, agreeing that none of
> those people give it, and also agreeing that Andromeda is too minor
> to provide it even if she is it, which is what I thought he was
> saying. Especially since many Slytherins seem like they might be
> better if we only heard about them from afar, or wind up being less
> than one might have expected from what one knew.
<snip>
Amy:
Probably best to ask this from Adam himself, but since you did say
you agree, what's meant by admirable and likable -- someone who was
admirable and likable by Harry etc.'s standards, or by fandom? If
we're getting to fandom, I love Harry, but he's not always that
likable or admirable -- by the same reasoning, I suppose, Snape has
bajillions of fans who both like and admire him.
If we're going by canon, the standards seem even more skewed -- who
Harry likes doesn't automatically place them on the good side, and
there are people Harry dislikes who are still on that side (ie,
Phineas, Snape). If it's an issue of who made the right choices for
the right reasons...even this doesn't seem to be a huge part of JKR's
story for any characters. The Trio was ultimately fighting to bring
down Voldemort, not mainly because of any fervent beliefs they had
but because he was a danger to society in general. Of course they had
certain beliefs -- persecution of Muggleborns was wrong, etc, but
this right and wrong theme wasn't really a strong one throughout the
book. It's disappointing that Draco didn't make a choice, but (and
this isn't just for the Slytherins, it's for every character) this
story wasn't about personal moral choices. It had a lot of other
messages, but moral choices wasn't really one of them. So why should
being admirable and likable put a Slytherin any farther above the
Slytherins we do have, who all seem to play into JKR's larger message?
Amy
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive