Likeable Slughorn (was: Villain!Dumbledore )
sistermagpie
sistermagpie at earthlink.net
Tue Oct 9 15:34:48 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 177858
> Irene:
> Going back to your examples, I just can't see the equivalence
between what he says and the real world "You are so clever for a black
person" bigotry. His surprise is akin to a surprise of two short
parents producing a 2.15m tall NBA player. Sure, can happen, but more
surprising than if both parents were tall.
>
> To reiterate - yes, it's very petty that we had 7 books, some of
them excessively huge, and yet the message is so muddled that we have
to sit here and split these hairs. I don't normally require my
literature to have messages, I even prefer it not to, but JKR very
obviously wanted to say something about bigotry and prejudice. It did
not work out very well, IMO.
Magpie:
Yes, I guess that's it. I mean, it seems like the one prejudice that's
really cared about is the one against Muggle-borns since that's
Voldemort's and they're Wizards. It is surprising, surely, when two
Muggles produce a magical child at all (and it's true that JKR saying
that they have a magical relative somewhere sort of goes against the
idea that magic is anything like creativity that can show up in any
one; you do need to be a member of the club, even if you don't know
it). But the fact that it's surprising that Muggles produce a Witch
does not necessarily make it surprising that they produce a Witch
who's as good as one born to Wizards.
But within canon it seems like thinking that Muggle-borns aren't as
good is supposed to be wrong. That you can be just as good a Wizard no
matter what you're bloodline. In CoS this disagreement is made
explicit with Lucius saying Draco should be ashamed to be beaten by
Hermione who has "no wizard family," Ron saying only people like the
Malfoys think that way while the rest of them know all the blood stuff
is rubbish. We're in the pov of a kid who's a Half-blood and who
explicitly notes that his being brought up culturally as a Muggle does
not put him behind other students. On the contrary, he's advantaged
with special powers cropping up throughout the series.
There's no difference at all made between Muggle-born kids and other
kids. Dean isn't even sure what he is, and no one can tell. We've got
exceptional Pure-bloods--James and Sirius, exceptional Half-bloods--
Harry, Snape, Tom Riddle, exceptional Muggle-borns--Hermione, Lily.
There's no place where we can tell what someone's background is based
on their parents. In fact, most if not all of the poorest Wizards we
know are Purebloods. Where does the idea that Muggle-borns should have
less potential come from? The only place I remember it being said is
by various Slytherins, with nothing said about actual proof or
reasoning. Hermione is insulted by being called Muggle.
Ironically in my experience in fandom people who have argued that
perhaps Pure-blood superiority was based on truth (either the truth
that Muggle-borns are dangerous or that they are inferior) have been
mocked and called Nazis.
I just really think something's wrong when this is the central trait
of the bad guy, the bad idea he appeals to in people, yet we're
defending it in the end due to Slughorn.
I have just as many problems with making it an good analogy to racism
in our world as anyone else. I know it's not the same thing. I don't
think "Mudblood" is the same as "N*****" at all (you can't divorce the
word from the history), I don't think Muggle-borns work really as a
race or as an ethnicity, or even as an immigrant group the way they're
portrayed. I find the whole question of their place in the world
poorly thought-out, underwritten and vague, a mish mosh for whatever's
needed at that moment.
But still, the idea of going into a class where the teacher thinks
you've got less potential because of your parents? That sounds very
much like what minorities deal with. I don't see how that's not being
thought of as inferior, and I doubt it's not going to lead to be
treated that way in subtle ways--even if you're being pushed for your
talents--this happens all the time. Even Mike's analogy of saying
something like "a Jewish track star--that's unusual." In many contexts
that's a fine point to make. I remember that joke in Airplane! where
somebody asks for "light reading" and is given a single page folded
pamphlet on "famous Jewish sports legends." That does not come across
at all as sleazy as Slughorn's promotion of himself in HBP.
But that still doesn't seem to me to equate to being thought of as
less inherently magical in a world obsessed with being magical, where
being magical is the basis of everything. It's what makes you not a
Muggle, not a Squib. It's what makes Neville's family drop him on his
head. It's pretty much the only thing that matters, and I thought it
was supposed to be important that having Muggle parents *didn't* make
you any less magical. And being magical is what matters.
Alla:
And that I do not care WHY he cultivates the talent. To me it is
enough that he **cultivates** the talent. If he gets something for
himself as well, I say more power to him. I think that his talented
students also get a lot out of it and I like it.
Magpie:
He cultivates talent if it will help him. And he cultivates plenty of
otehr things that are equally important to him, like family
connections--these things can be more important than talent depending
on the situation. That's why to me focusing on "he promotes talent!"
seems to me to be wanting him to be something he isn't. He's fine
promoting people with good bloodlines over people with talent if
talent hasn't gotten them into the Slug Club to begin with. I also
don't think his excluding Draco should be taken as the kind of sign it
seems taken as. He doesn't want kids of Death Eaters because he's
afraid of Death Eaters. I don't see that means anything more than
that. I don't think it's a big deal any time he doesn't put a
Pureblood in his club.
Nor does he cultivate the talent that I see, he just networks people
that catch his eye. At least that's not what I consider cultivating
talent. Sometimes talented kids get perks from Slughorn, that's great.
That doesn't make him "the teacher who cultivates talent" for me by a
longshot. To me he seems like he's probably far more likely to be
helping to fill jobs with those who are well-connected already over
those who might be more talented. That's how Cormac seems to see it
too.
-m
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive