Snape/Expelliarmus (Was Disappointment Was: Deaths in DH
va32h
va32h at comcast.net
Sat Sep 29 00:35:49 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 177526
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "starview316" <starview316 at ...>
wrote:
> Snape taught Harry "Expelliarmus" (which he acknowledged in
> CoS: "Shouldn't have let Snape teach us that one."), which has become
> his signature spell.
va32h:
Just to go on another tangent here - I see this sentiment a lot "Snape
taught Harry his signature spell". And I really think it's become one
of those legends like "someone will do magic late in life in book 7"
that has really been extrapolated into something HUUUUGE, when it's
not.
There was the Duelling Club. Snape used the spell once, against
Lockhart. Harry copied him. This is not "Snape personally instructed
Harry in the spell he would later use to defeat Voldemort three times!"
It's more like "Harry and a bunch of other kids were in the room when
Snape used the spell, and so they heard the incantation." Technically
Snape taught everybody in the club "Expelliarmus", if they did not know
it already. And it's a standard spell, after all, not some arcane
knowledge carefully handed down. Harry would have learned it
eventually.
Harry learns other spells just by hearing the incantation and copying
it...I just don't see how this has become one of the defining moments
of the Snape/Harry relationship. It's a nice bit of irony, but that's
all, IMO.
On another topic, I've seen it mentioned a few times that Snape's
bravery redeems (or improves) Slytherin House...but for me, anything
Snape did to positively reflect on Slytherin House was totally negated
by Dumbledore's comment "Sometimes I think we sort too soon," (which is
CANON, as we've been told to provide) and which I can only interpret as
Dumbledore saying "Snape, you should not have been in Slytherin,
because you actually have redeeming qualities.'
va32h
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive